Impact of Implementing a Structured Nurse-led Pain Reassessment Protocol on Pain Outcomes among Hospitalized Cancer Patients: A Before-and-after Interventional Study

Abstract Background: Pain reassessment after analgesic administration is essential for effective cancer pain management, yet reassessment practices remain inconsistent in routine clinical settings. Nurses are well positioned to facilitate timely pain reassessment and appropriate escalation of care. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of implementing a structured nurse-led pain reassessment protocol on pain outcomes among hospitalized cancer patients. Methods: A quasi-experimental before-and-after interventional study was conducted among 100 hospitalized adult cancer patients receiving analgesics for cancer-related pain. Fifty patients were enrolled during the pre-intervention phase and 50 during the post-intervention phase. The intervention comprised a structured nurse-led pain reassessment protocol supported by nursing education and standardized documentation. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) before analgesic administration and during reassessment. Secondary outcomes included frequency and timeliness of pain reassessment, rescue analgesic utilization, and patient satisfaction. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Reassessment NRS scores were lower in the post-intervention group than in the pre-intervention group (3.9 ± 1.5 vs. 5.8 ± 1.7; P < 0.001). Mean reduction in NRS scores was greater following intervention (3.0 ± 1.2 vs. 1.3 ± 0.9; P < 0.001), and more patients achieved a clinically meaningful pain reduction (80.0% vs. 38.0%; P < 0.001). Documented pain reassessment, timely reassessment, rescue analgesic utilization, and patient satisfaction also improved significantly (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: Implementation of a structured nurse-led pain reassessment protocol was associated with improved pain reassessment practices and favorable pain-related outcomes among hospitalized cancer patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Pain
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_76_26
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Opioid Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Implementing a Structured Nurse-led Pain Reassessment Protocol on Pain Outcomes among Hospitalized Cancer Patients: A Before-and-after Interventional Study

Sapna More, Shubham Gadaria, Somya Vishwakarma, AMAN KUMAR SINGH RAJAN
Indian Journal of Pain
Pain Management and Opioid Use
article

Impact of Implementing a Structured Nurse-led Pain Reassessment Protocol on Pain Outcomes among Hospitalized Cancer Patients: A Before-and-after Interventional Study

Sapna More, Shubham Gadaria, Somya Vishwakarma, AMAN KUMAR SINGH RAJAN
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Pain reassessment after analgesic administration is essential for effective cancer pain management, yet reassessment practices remain inconsistent in routine clinical settings. Nurses are well positioned to facilitate timely pain reassessment and appropriate escalation of care. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of implementing a structured nurse-led pain reassessment protocol on pain outcomes among hospitalized cancer patients. Methods: A quasi-experimental before-and-after interventional study was conducted among 100 hospitalized adult cancer patients receiving analgesics for cancer-related pain. Fifty patients were enrolled during the pre-intervention phase and 50 during the post-intervention phase. The intervention comprised a structured nurse-led pain reassessment protocol supported by nursing education and standardized documentation. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) before analgesic administration and during reassessment. Secondary outcomes included frequency and timeliness of pain reassessment, rescue analgesic utilization, and patient satisfaction. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Reassessment NRS scores were lower in the post-intervention group than in the pre-intervention group (3.9 ± 1.5 vs. 5.8 ± 1.7; P < 0.001). Mean reduction in NRS scores was greater following intervention (3.0 ± 1.2 vs. 1.3 ± 0.9; P < 0.001), and more patients achieved a clinically meaningful pain reduction (80.0% vs. 38.0%; P < 0.001). Documented pain reassessment, timely reassessment, rescue analgesic utilization, and patient satisfaction also improved significantly (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: Implementation of a structured nurse-led pain reassessment protocol was associated with improved pain reassessment practices and favorable pain-related outcomes among hospitalized cancer patients.

Indian Journal of Pain
Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pain Management and Opioid Use
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.