Cross‐Modal Activation, Integration, and Validation When Reading Illustrated Texts: Evidence From Reading Times and Eye‐Tracking

ABSTRACT The experiments investigated cognitive processes involved in reading illustrated text, focusing on cross‐modal activation, integration, and validation between text and picture. Using an adapted contradiction paradigm, both studies manipulated, within a single illustrated narrative, whether a previously presented picture was consistent or inconsistent with a later target sentence. Experiment 1 ( N = 285) employed sentence‐by‐sentence presentation and key‐press reading times, conceptually replicating earlier findings. Experiment 2 ( N = 143) extended the paradigm to a more naturalistic context, presenting short paragraphs on each page and using eye‐tracking. Across both experiments, inconsistencies led to longer processing times: Experiment 1 revealed prolonged reading times for the spillover sentence; Experiment 2 showed longer processing of the target sentence. Increased gaze transitions between the target sentence and the picture presented on the same page were observed. These results provide preliminary evidence that readers engage in cross‐modal activation, integration, and validation processes when reading illustrated texts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70277
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross‐Modal Activation, Integration, and Validation When Reading Illustrated Texts: Evidence From Reading Times and Eye‐Tracking

Emely Hoch, Anne Schüler, Pauline Frick
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
article

Cross‐Modal Activation, Integration, and Validation When Reading Illustrated Texts: Evidence From Reading Times and Eye‐Tracking

Emely Hoch, Anne Schüler, Pauline Frick
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The experiments investigated cognitive processes involved in reading illustrated text, focusing on cross‐modal activation, integration, and validation between text and picture. Using an adapted contradiction paradigm, both studies manipulated, within a single illustrated narrative, whether a previously presented picture was consistent or inconsistent with a later target sentence. Experiment 1 ( N = 285) employed sentence‐by‐sentence presentation and key‐press reading times, conceptually replicating earlier findings. Experiment 2 ( N = 143) extended the paradigm to a more naturalistic context, presenting short paragraphs on each page and using eye‐tracking. Across both experiments, inconsistencies led to longer processing times: Experiment 1 revealed prolonged reading times for the spillover sentence; Experiment 2 showed longer processing of the target sentence. Increased gaze transitions between the target sentence and the picture presented on the same page were observed. These results provide preliminary evidence that readers engage in cross‐modal activation, integration, and validation processes when reading illustrated texts.

Applied Cognitive PsychologyVol. 40(5)
University of Zurich (CH), Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen (DE), Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.