Patient‐reported acceptable symptom state does not reflect quadriceps symmetry 1 year after ACL reconstruction

Abstract Purpose To quantify the agreement between achievement of the validated patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds for Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Sport and KOOS Quality of Life (QoL) and isokinetic quadriceps limb symmetry index (LSI) ≥ 90% in a prospective cohort undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and to determine whether this agreement was modified by autograft type. Methods Ninety consecutive patients undergoing primary ACLR with systematic anterolateral augmentation were prospectively allocated to three autograft groups in cohorts of 30: rectus femoris (RF), quadriceps tendon (QT) and hamstrings (HS). At 12 months postoperatively, all patients underwent concentric isokinetic testing at 60°/s and completed the KOOS Sport and Recreation and KOOS QoL subscales. Concordance between PASS achievement (KOOS Sport ≥75; KOOS QoL ≥62.5) and quadriceps LSI ≥ 90% was analysed using Cohen's kappa with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals and McNemar exact test. Results Agreement between PASS achievement and isokinetic quadriceps symmetry was absent: KOOS Sport versus LSI κ = 0.060 (95% confidence interval [CI] −0.071 to 0.191; McNemar p < 0.001); KOOS QoL versus LSI κ = 0.030 (95% CI −0.062 to 0.122; McNemar p < 0.001). Forty‐two patients (46.7%) met the KOOS Sport PASS threshold while showing LSI < 90%, compared with only five patients who achieved quadriceps LSI ≥ 90% without meeting the KOOS Sport PASS threshold. Among patients who reached the KOOS Sport PASS threshold, 76% had concurrent quadriceps LSI scores below 90%. The pattern was consistent across the three autograft groups (RF 50%, QT 47%, HS 43%; χ 2 p = 0.875). Conclusion PASS achievement and isokinetic quadriceps symmetry capture distinct dimensions of recovery 1 year after ACLR. The two assessments diverged in approximately half of the cohort, and this discordance was independent of autograft type. Patient‐reported and objective measures should be regarded as complementary rather than interchangeable, and a satisfactory PROM result alone should not be taken as evidence of restored quadriceps symmetry. Level of Evidence Level II, prospective comparative study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70584
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient‐reported acceptable symptom state does not reflect quadriceps symmetry 1 year after ACL reconstruction

Tomás Pineda, Nathan H. Varady, David Mazy, Julien Druel et al.
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Patient‐reported acceptable symptom state does not reflect quadriceps symmetry 1 year after ACL reconstruction

Tomás Pineda, Nathan H. Varady, David Mazy, Julien Druel, Christophe Jacquet, Matthieu Ollivier
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To quantify the agreement between achievement of the validated patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds for Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Sport and KOOS Quality of Life (QoL) and isokinetic quadriceps limb symmetry index (LSI) ≥ 90% in a prospective cohort undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and to determine whether this agreement was modified by autograft type. Methods Ninety consecutive patients undergoing primary ACLR with systematic anterolateral augmentation were prospectively allocated to three autograft groups in cohorts of 30: rectus femoris (RF), quadriceps tendon (QT) and hamstrings (HS). At 12 months postoperatively, all patients underwent concentric isokinetic testing at 60°/s and completed the KOOS Sport and Recreation and KOOS QoL subscales. Concordance between PASS achievement (KOOS Sport ≥75; KOOS QoL ≥62.5) and quadriceps LSI ≥ 90% was analysed using Cohen's kappa with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals and McNemar exact test. Results Agreement between PASS achievement and isokinetic quadriceps symmetry was absent: KOOS Sport versus LSI κ = 0.060 (95% confidence interval [CI] −0.071 to 0.191; McNemar p < 0.001); KOOS QoL versus LSI κ = 0.030 (95% CI −0.062 to 0.122; McNemar p < 0.001). Forty‐two patients (46.7%) met the KOOS Sport PASS threshold while showing LSI < 90%, compared with only five patients who achieved quadriceps LSI ≥ 90% without meeting the KOOS Sport PASS threshold. Among patients who reached the KOOS Sport PASS threshold, 76% had concurrent quadriceps LSI scores below 90%. The pattern was consistent across the three autograft groups (RF 50%, QT 47%, HS 43%; χ 2 p = 0.875). Conclusion PASS achievement and isokinetic quadriceps symmetry capture distinct dimensions of recovery 1 year after ACLR. The two assessments diverged in approximately half of the cohort, and this discordance was independent of autograft type. Patient‐reported and objective measures should be regarded as complementary rather than interchangeable, and a satisfactory PROM result alone should not be taken as evidence of restored quadriceps symmetry. Level of Evidence Level II, prospective comparative study.

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Hospital for Special Surgery (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Institut des Sciences Moléculaires (FR), Finis Terrae University (CL), Hôpital Sainte-Marguerite (FR), Hospital del Trabajador (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.