Modelling the relationship between implementation processes and their operational contexts: pre-implementation study of a health and wellbeing coaching intervention for people living with HIV

Understanding the interplay between implementation processes and their operational contexts is a critical challenge in implementation science and healthcare practice. This study examines this relationship through a qualitative analysis of key informants’ perspectives on implementing a health and wellbeing coaching intervention for people with HIV within the SPHERE Trial. We aimed to identify clinicians’ and service providers’ attributions of the relational and systemic mechanisms shaping the implementation of the SPHERE coaching intervention, and to explore their beliefs about the collaborative work required for its operationalization in NHS settings. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 key informants, (NHS staff n = 12 and voluntary sector staff n = 8). Attribution analysis and qualitative content analysis, informed by Normalization Process Theory (NPT), were used to analyse participants’ beliefs about contextual mechanisms and collective action driving implementation. These methods identified relational and systemic factors influencing the intervention and mapped them against NPT-derived implementation strategies. Key informants highlighted relational mechanisms—such as diagnostic shock, stigmatization, and social destabilisation—that shape people with HIV’s engagement with care, necessitating trauma-informed and stigma-responsive coaching. Systemic mechanisms, including service degradation due to austerity and commissioning constraints, explained the need for coaching to support navigation of fragmented services. Key informants identified shared sense-making, mobilization of existing multidisciplinary teams, and adaptive strategies to integrate coaching into routine workflows while addressing workforce and funding challenges. We translated these into a set of generalisable propositions that would support further analysis. Combining attribution analysis with NPT provides a robust framework for understanding how relational and systemic contexts dynamically shape implementation processes. Successful integration of health and wellbeing coaching for people with HIV demands trauma-informed approaches, strategic use of existing service infrastructures, and adaptive leadership to navigate operational constraints, ensuring coaching addresses psychosocial needs and enhances service integration. 47,187,932

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Implementation Science Communications
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-026-00990-3
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling the relationship between implementation processes and their operational contexts: pre-implementation study of a health and wellbeing coaching intervention for people living with HIV

Fiona Burns, Janey Sewell, T. Charles Witzel, Vasiliki Papageorgiou et al.
Implementation Science Communications
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Modelling the relationship between implementation processes and their operational contexts: pre-implementation study of a health and wellbeing coaching intervention for people living with HIV

Fiona Burns, Janey Sewell, T. Charles Witzel, Vasiliki Papageorgiou, Alison Rodger, Carl R. May, Fiona Lampe
article en

Abstract

Understanding the interplay between implementation processes and their operational contexts is a critical challenge in implementation science and healthcare practice. This study examines this relationship through a qualitative analysis of key informants’ perspectives on implementing a health and wellbeing coaching intervention for people with HIV within the SPHERE Trial. We aimed to identify clinicians’ and service providers’ attributions of the relational and systemic mechanisms shaping the implementation of the SPHERE coaching intervention, and to explore their beliefs about the collaborative work required for its operationalization in NHS settings. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 key informants, (NHS staff n = 12 and voluntary sector staff n = 8). Attribution analysis and qualitative content analysis, informed by Normalization Process Theory (NPT), were used to analyse participants’ beliefs about contextual mechanisms and collective action driving implementation. These methods identified relational and systemic factors influencing the intervention and mapped them against NPT-derived implementation strategies. Key informants highlighted relational mechanisms—such as diagnostic shock, stigmatization, and social destabilisation—that shape people with HIV’s engagement with care, necessitating trauma-informed and stigma-responsive coaching. Systemic mechanisms, including service degradation due to austerity and commissioning constraints, explained the need for coaching to support navigation of fragmented services. Key informants identified shared sense-making, mobilization of existing multidisciplinary teams, and adaptive strategies to integrate coaching into routine workflows while addressing workforce and funding challenges. We translated these into a set of generalisable propositions that would support further analysis. Combining attribution analysis with NPT provides a robust framework for understanding how relational and systemic contexts dynamically shape implementation processes. Successful integration of health and wellbeing coaching for people with HIV demands trauma-informed approaches, strategic use of existing service infrastructures, and adaptive leadership to navigate operational constraints, ensuring coaching addresses psychosocial needs and enhances service integration. 47,187,932

Implementation Science Communications
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Faculty of Public Health (GB), Roland Hill (United Kingdom) (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.