The AI Stratification Spiral: How Predictive Systems Turn Historical Inequality into Statistical Common Sense

This preprint develops the AI Stratification Spiral, a sociological framework for explaining how predictive systems can reproduce and intensify existing inequalities over time. The framework identifies a recursive process linking unequal data production, algorithmic interpretation, institutional allocation, and confirmatory data generation. When predictions influence access to opportunities, resources, scrutiny, or support, the resulting outcomes can generate new data that appear to validate the original prediction. In this way, historically contingent inequalities may gradually acquire the appearance of objective statistical evidence. The article connects debates on artificial intelligence, algorithmic governance, social stratification, cumulative disadvantage, and institutional decision-making, while emphasizing that these processes are not technologically inevitable but depend on how predictive systems are designed, deployed, and governed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22111073
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The AI Stratification Spiral: How Predictive Systems Turn Historical Inequality into Statistical Common Sense

Massimo Ragnedda, Maria Laura Ruiu
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

The AI Stratification Spiral: How Predictive Systems Turn Historical Inequality into Statistical Common Sense

Massimo Ragnedda, Maria Laura Ruiu
article en

Abstract

This preprint develops the AI Stratification Spiral, a sociological framework for explaining how predictive systems can reproduce and intensify existing inequalities over time. The framework identifies a recursive process linking unequal data production, algorithmic interpretation, institutional allocation, and confirmatory data generation. When predictions influence access to opportunities, resources, scrutiny, or support, the resulting outcomes can generate new data that appear to validate the original prediction. In this way, historically contingent inequalities may gradually acquire the appearance of objective statistical evidence. The article connects debates on artificial intelligence, algorithmic governance, social stratification, cumulative disadvantage, and institutional decision-making, while emphasizing that these processes are not technologically inevitable but depend on how predictive systems are designed, deployed, and governed.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
American University of Sharjah (AE), University of Sharjah (AE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The AI Stratification Spiral: How Predictive Systems Turn Historical Inequality into Statistical Common Sense — Massimo Ragnedda, Maria Laura Ruiu · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS