Foreign aid modalities and MNEs’ investments

Abstract Growing interest in leveraging foreign aid to mobilize private capital has led to a shift in aid policy from traditional grants toward financial instruments such as loans and equity investments (non-grant aid). Yet, we have a limited understanding of how different aid modalities relate to firm-level investment behavior. This study examines how bilateral aid is associated with firms’ international investment, distinguishing between grant and non-grant aid. Using data on greenfield investments from firms in 30 OECD donor countries over the 2003–2020 period, we analyze firms’ decisions to invest and investment scale measured through the number of projects, jobs created, and capital investment. We find that bilateral aid, particularly non-grant aid, is positively associated with investment decisions, project numbers, and job creation. These findings highlight the importance of aid policy design in shaping firm investment and provide new firm-level evidence on the aid–investment relationship. By linking aid modalities to firm investment across multiple countries and outcomes, this study contributes to research on development finance and informs policy debates on how the design of aid relates to private sector participation in development, particularly in the context of ongoing changes in the global aid landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Business Policy
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-026-00256-8
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Foreign aid modalities and MNEs’ investments

Flladina Zilja, Salma Mahamed
Journal of International Business Policy
International Development and Aid
article

Foreign aid modalities and MNEs’ investments

Flladina Zilja, Salma Mahamed
article en

Abstract

Abstract Growing interest in leveraging foreign aid to mobilize private capital has led to a shift in aid policy from traditional grants toward financial instruments such as loans and equity investments (non-grant aid). Yet, we have a limited understanding of how different aid modalities relate to firm-level investment behavior. This study examines how bilateral aid is associated with firms’ international investment, distinguishing between grant and non-grant aid. Using data on greenfield investments from firms in 30 OECD donor countries over the 2003–2020 period, we analyze firms’ decisions to invest and investment scale measured through the number of projects, jobs created, and capital investment. We find that bilateral aid, particularly non-grant aid, is positively associated with investment decisions, project numbers, and job creation. These findings highlight the importance of aid policy design in shaping firm investment and provide new firm-level evidence on the aid–investment relationship. By linking aid modalities to firm investment across multiple countries and outcomes, this study contributes to research on development finance and informs policy debates on how the design of aid relates to private sector participation in development, particularly in the context of ongoing changes in the global aid landscape.

Journal of International Business Policy
Copenhagen Business School (DK)
Copenhagen Business School
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.