Novel Combined Degradation Index for Long-Term Performance Comparison of Epoxy and Asphalt-Based High-Friction Surface Treatments

High-friction surface treatments (HFST) are crucial safety measures that improve skid resistance and reduce accidents on high-risk roadway sections. While traditional epoxy-based HFSTs are commonly utilized, they have limitations, such as compatibility with existing pavements, expensive construction and removal costs, and durability issues owing to substrate pavement conditions. This study presents a comprehensive experiment-based investigation into the long-term degradation behavior of innovative asphalt-based flexible HFST alternatives versus traditional epoxy systems. Under controlled polishing conditions, laboratory testing was carried out to compare the performance of both systems. The experiment program included systematic polishing investigations up to 140 K cycles on bauxite and rhyolite aggregates of two different gradations. The performance was evaluated using coefficient of friction (COF), mean profile depth (MPD), and a new combined degradation index (CDI = COF × MPD), which integrates both micro- and macro-texture degradation. CDI validity was supported through consistency with multi-speed friction measurements and unsupervised k-means clustering (silhouette score = 0.549), which identified statistically distinct CDI ranges representing low, moderate, and high degradation states based solely on laboratory measurements. To characterize degradation progression, multiple models were evaluated, with Weibull-based functions providing the best fit (average R 2 = 0.95) relative to exponential (0.90) and power decay (0.76) models. Extrapolation to 300 K cycles indicates that epoxy systems maintain CDI values within the low-degradation range throughout the extended test duration, while asphalt-based systems typically transition into the moderate- or high-degradation ranges between 150 K and 200 K cycles. Among the asphalt systems, PG88-16 highly polymer modified (HPM) with coarse calcined bauxite retained CDI above the moderate-degradation threshold through approximately 245 K cycles (≈82% of epoxy’s >300 K performance window), though with lower absolute CDI values. Asphalt-based HFSTs show promising adaptability to varied pavement conditions and offer practical advantages in constructability, substrate compatibility, and cost. Although epoxy systems show higher absolute durability in laboratory testing, certain asphalt-based configurations deliver performance levels that may be adequate in applications where both systems exceed typical HFST design demands. The validated CDI framework establishes a robust, laboratory-based methodology for evaluating HFST material degradation; however, further work is needed to calibrate CDI ranges for field conditions and broader pavement applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981261469560
Primary Topic
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Novel Combined Degradation Index for Long-Term Performance Comparison of Epoxy and Asphalt-Based High-Friction Surface Treatments

Magdy Abdelrahman, Alireza Roshan
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
article

Novel Combined Degradation Index for Long-Term Performance Comparison of Epoxy and Asphalt-Based High-Friction Surface Treatments

Magdy Abdelrahman, Alireza Roshan
article en

Abstract

High-friction surface treatments (HFST) are crucial safety measures that improve skid resistance and reduce accidents on high-risk roadway sections. While traditional epoxy-based HFSTs are commonly utilized, they have limitations, such as compatibility with existing pavements, expensive construction and removal costs, and durability issues owing to substrate pavement conditions. This study presents a comprehensive experiment-based investigation into the long-term degradation behavior of innovative asphalt-based flexible HFST alternatives versus traditional epoxy systems. Under controlled polishing conditions, laboratory testing was carried out to compare the performance of both systems. The experiment program included systematic polishing investigations up to 140 K cycles on bauxite and rhyolite aggregates of two different gradations. The performance was evaluated using coefficient of friction (COF), mean profile depth (MPD), and a new combined degradation index (CDI = COF × MPD), which integrates both micro- and macro-texture degradation. CDI validity was supported through consistency with multi-speed friction measurements and unsupervised k-means clustering (silhouette score = 0.549), which identified statistically distinct CDI ranges representing low, moderate, and high degradation states based solely on laboratory measurements. To characterize degradation progression, multiple models were evaluated, with Weibull-based functions providing the best fit (average R 2 = 0.95) relative to exponential (0.90) and power decay (0.76) models. Extrapolation to 300 K cycles indicates that epoxy systems maintain CDI values within the low-degradation range throughout the extended test duration, while asphalt-based systems typically transition into the moderate- or high-degradation ranges between 150 K and 200 K cycles. Among the asphalt systems, PG88-16 highly polymer modified (HPM) with coarse calcined bauxite retained CDI above the moderate-degradation threshold through approximately 245 K cycles (≈82% of epoxy’s >300 K performance window), though with lower absolute CDI values. Asphalt-based HFSTs show promising adaptability to varied pavement conditions and offer practical advantages in constructability, substrate compatibility, and cost. Although epoxy systems show higher absolute durability in laboratory testing, certain asphalt-based configurations deliver performance levels that may be adequate in applications where both systems exceed typical HFST design demands. The validated CDI framework establishes a robust, laboratory-based methodology for evaluating HFST material degradation; however, further work is needed to calibrate CDI ranges for field conditions and broader pavement applications.

Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Missouri University of Science and Technology (US)
Missouri Department of Transportation
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.