Do Brain Extracellular Fluid Concentrations Predict PET ‐Inferred Receptor Occupancy in Human CNS ? A Mechanistic Model‐Based Analysis of Dopamine D2 Receptor Ligands

We previously developed a mechanistic model framework integrating physiologically based pharmacokinetic model (LeiCNS‐PK3.0), binding kinetics, and receptor dynamics, to predict regional human central nervous system (CNS) receptor occupancy (RO), using brain extracellular fluid (brain ECF ) concentrations. Positron emission tomography (PET)‐RO is a non‐invasive biomarker to estimate, and validate human CNS RO. However, for highly lipophilic drug buprenorphine brain ECF concentrations‐based RO predictions deviated substantially from PET‐RO. This mismatch and the lipophilicity driven brain cell membrane (brain M ) accumulation motivated us to investigate relevance of brain ECF vs. brain M concentrations for PET‐RO. We identified human studies reporting plasma PK and CNS PET‐RO for D2 receptor ligands spanning lipophilicities. Population PK parameters, derived via model fitting, served as inputs to the mechanistic framework to simulate brain ECF and brain M ‐based regional RO and compared with PET‐RO. We systematically assessed the impact of lipophilicity, receptor dynamics, endogenous ligands, and schizophrenia‐related physiological changes on simulations accuracy. Brain M concentrations showed better agreement with PET‐RO than brain ECF for five of eight D2 ligands. However, neither improvement nor brain M partitioning showed a clear trend with logP; substitution yielded modest improvement. Receptor internalization reduced simulated RO and enhanced PET agreement (remoxipride/haloperidol), independent of lipophilicity. Endogenous dopamine and schizophrenia‐related changes had negligible effects. This study demonstrated that brain M concentrations offer improved PET‐RO alignment for a subset of compounds, independent of lipophilicity suggesting role of other drug‐specific factors in brain M accumulation or lack thereof. The integrated mechanistic framework offers potential to enhance CNS drug treatment, subject to further development via qMRI, hMRI, MRS, and controlled clinical studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70453
Primary Topic
Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Brain Extracellular Fluid Concentrations Predict PET ‐Inferred Receptor Occupancy in Human CNS ? A Mechanistic Model‐Based Analysis of Dopamine D2 Receptor Ligands

Elizabeth C. M. de Lange, J. G. Coen van Hasselt, Divakar Budda
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
article

Do Brain Extracellular Fluid Concentrations Predict PET ‐Inferred Receptor Occupancy in Human CNS ? A Mechanistic Model‐Based Analysis of Dopamine D2 Receptor Ligands

Elizabeth C. M. de Lange, J. G. Coen van Hasselt, Divakar Budda
article en

Abstract

We previously developed a mechanistic model framework integrating physiologically based pharmacokinetic model (LeiCNS‐PK3.0), binding kinetics, and receptor dynamics, to predict regional human central nervous system (CNS) receptor occupancy (RO), using brain extracellular fluid (brain ECF ) concentrations. Positron emission tomography (PET)‐RO is a non‐invasive biomarker to estimate, and validate human CNS RO. However, for highly lipophilic drug buprenorphine brain ECF concentrations‐based RO predictions deviated substantially from PET‐RO. This mismatch and the lipophilicity driven brain cell membrane (brain M ) accumulation motivated us to investigate relevance of brain ECF vs. brain M concentrations for PET‐RO. We identified human studies reporting plasma PK and CNS PET‐RO for D2 receptor ligands spanning lipophilicities. Population PK parameters, derived via model fitting, served as inputs to the mechanistic framework to simulate brain ECF and brain M ‐based regional RO and compared with PET‐RO. We systematically assessed the impact of lipophilicity, receptor dynamics, endogenous ligands, and schizophrenia‐related physiological changes on simulations accuracy. Brain M concentrations showed better agreement with PET‐RO than brain ECF for five of eight D2 ligands. However, neither improvement nor brain M partitioning showed a clear trend with logP; substitution yielded modest improvement. Receptor internalization reduced simulated RO and enhanced PET agreement (remoxipride/haloperidol), independent of lipophilicity. Endogenous dopamine and schizophrenia‐related changes had negligible effects. This study demonstrated that brain M concentrations offer improved PET‐RO alignment for a subset of compounds, independent of lipophilicity suggesting role of other drug‐specific factors in brain M accumulation or lack thereof. The integrated mechanistic framework offers potential to enhance CNS drug treatment, subject to further development via qMRI, hMRI, MRS, and controlled clinical studies.

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Centre for Human Drug Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.