Resolving chemical names in the NSW Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act: a cheminformatics analysis of statutory drug nomenclature and its evolution

Using the NSW Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Schedule 1 of prohibited plants or prohibited drugs as an example of legislation that may be difficult for a computer search engine to resolve, an approach to produce valid chemical names and identifiers from the schedule entries is described and implemented. Out of the present Schedule of 342 discrete chemical names only 8 remained entirely unresolved. The original 1985 Schedule 1 contained 95 discrete names, with all but one resolved. The more than three-fold increase in prohibited substances between 1985 and 2026 is attributed to more directly specifying drugs and the rise of a diverse range of new chemical compounds, including synthetic cannabinoids, cathinones, analogues of fentanyl, new NBOMe’s, benzodiazapines, anabolic steroids and novel pharmaceuticals. There is ambiguity in resolving names in Schedule 1, and not specifying stereochemistry is a problem with the present legislation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2026.2723123
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resolving chemical names in the NSW Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act: a cheminformatics analysis of statutory drug nomenclature and its evolution

David Brynn Hibbert
Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Resolving chemical names in the NSW Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act: a cheminformatics analysis of statutory drug nomenclature and its evolution

David Brynn Hibbert
article en

Abstract

Using the NSW Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Schedule 1 of prohibited plants or prohibited drugs as an example of legislation that may be difficult for a computer search engine to resolve, an approach to produce valid chemical names and identifiers from the schedule entries is described and implemented. Out of the present Schedule of 342 discrete chemical names only 8 remained entirely unresolved. The original 1985 Schedule 1 contained 95 discrete names, with all but one resolved. The more than three-fold increase in prohibited substances between 1985 and 2026 is attributed to more directly specifying drugs and the rise of a diverse range of new chemical compounds, including synthetic cannabinoids, cathinones, analogues of fentanyl, new NBOMe’s, benzodiazapines, anabolic steroids and novel pharmaceuticals. There is ambiguity in resolving names in Schedule 1, and not specifying stereochemistry is a problem with the present legislation.

Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.