Cultivating curriculum resilience in higher educational institutions: a novel decision tool

The vulnerability of higher education institutions to unexpected crisis events was starkly illustrated by the COVID-19 crisis and suggests they must cultivate resilience capabilities as a strategic priority. The scholarship has recently begun focusing on the transformative power of curricula to stimulate solutions for interdisciplinary challenges such as resilience. We contribute to this emergent research stream using an action design research and mixed-methods approach to develop a decision tool to evaluate curriculum resilience (CR). In the first phase, we deduced a novel CR framework, depicting it as a process connecting four curriculum dimensions to four generic resilience properties. This framework comprises our main scholarly contribution and was informed by the literature and a survey conducted with international educational stakeholders (n = 35). We analyzed the survey results using the Wilcoxon-signed-rank test and thematic analysis for the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. In phase 2, using a Delphi process (n = 25), we elaborated a second survey and refined it by consensus with expert educational stakeholders. The resulting survey tool probes attitudes and opinions of students, staff and program leaders regarding specific dimensions of CR. The survey lays the foundations for educational decision-makers to assess, monitor and improve CR and comprises the paper’s key contribution to practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Higher Education
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2026.2719848
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultivating curriculum resilience in higher educational institutions: a novel decision tool

Ann-Kristin Winkens, Roger Waldeck, MacDonald Kanyangale, Clara Lemke et al.
Studies in Higher Education
Resilience and Mental Health
article

Cultivating curriculum resilience in higher educational institutions: a novel decision tool

Ann-Kristin Winkens, Roger Waldeck, MacDonald Kanyangale, Clara Lemke, J. Gardner Le Gars
article en

Abstract

The vulnerability of higher education institutions to unexpected crisis events was starkly illustrated by the COVID-19 crisis and suggests they must cultivate resilience capabilities as a strategic priority. The scholarship has recently begun focusing on the transformative power of curricula to stimulate solutions for interdisciplinary challenges such as resilience. We contribute to this emergent research stream using an action design research and mixed-methods approach to develop a decision tool to evaluate curriculum resilience (CR). In the first phase, we deduced a novel CR framework, depicting it as a process connecting four curriculum dimensions to four generic resilience properties. This framework comprises our main scholarly contribution and was informed by the literature and a survey conducted with international educational stakeholders (n = 35). We analyzed the survey results using the Wilcoxon-signed-rank test and thematic analysis for the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. In phase 2, using a Delphi process (n = 25), we elaborated a second survey and refined it by consensus with expert educational stakeholders. The resulting survey tool probes attitudes and opinions of students, staff and program leaders regarding specific dimensions of CR. The survey lays the foundations for educational decision-makers to assess, monitor and improve CR and comprises the paper’s key contribution to practice.

Studies in Higher Education
IMT Atlantique (FR), RWTH Aachen University (DE), École Supérieure de Commerce de Rennes (FR), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.