Fostering Critical Thinking and Reasoned Discourse in the Post-Truth Era: Towards a Post-Managerial Organizational Epistemology

This paper argues that the continued reliance on managerialism as a foundational theory of action in education, with its focus on efficiency, uniformity and control, is antithetical to the goals of fostering critical thinking and reasoned discourse. This underexplored misalignment diminishes our collective capacity for reasoned discourse, essential for citizenship in a civil democracy. We trace the decline in civil discourse and anti-intellectualism to the epistemological foundations of the field. Specifically, we highlight that the dominant managerial paradigm is antithetical to the goals of learning. Here, managerialism frames learning as the transfer of knowledge from expert to novice, inviting compliance and the suspension of one’s own sense making capabilities, rather than active, reciprocal, and critical engagement. Using what we describe as a post-managerial theory building method, we propose a post-managerial organizational epistemology grounded in the science of learning, focusing on developing critical thinkers and problem solvers rather than producing standardized learning outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Educational Studies
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2026.2717372
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fostering Critical Thinking and Reasoned Discourse in the Post-Truth Era: Towards a Post-Managerial Organizational Epistemology

Ian Sutherland, Steve Myran
British Journal of Educational Studies
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Fostering Critical Thinking and Reasoned Discourse in the Post-Truth Era: Towards a Post-Managerial Organizational Epistemology

Ian Sutherland, Steve Myran
article en

Abstract

This paper argues that the continued reliance on managerialism as a foundational theory of action in education, with its focus on efficiency, uniformity and control, is antithetical to the goals of fostering critical thinking and reasoned discourse. This underexplored misalignment diminishes our collective capacity for reasoned discourse, essential for citizenship in a civil democracy. We trace the decline in civil discourse and anti-intellectualism to the epistemological foundations of the field. Specifically, we highlight that the dominant managerial paradigm is antithetical to the goals of learning. Here, managerialism frames learning as the transfer of knowledge from expert to novice, inviting compliance and the suspension of one’s own sense making capabilities, rather than active, reciprocal, and critical engagement. Using what we describe as a post-managerial theory building method, we propose a post-managerial organizational epistemology grounded in the science of learning, focusing on developing critical thinkers and problem solvers rather than producing standardized learning outcomes.

British Journal of Educational Studies
Dominion University College (GH), Concordia University (US), Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fostering Critical Thinking and Reasoned Discourse in the Post-Truth Era: Towards a Post-Managerial Organizational Epistemology — Ian Sutherland, Steve Myran · British Journal of Educational Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS