An Investigation into Referrals Placed Following Positive Screening With the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised With Follow-up

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine referral practices after positive autism spectrum disorder screening with the modified checklist for autism in toddlers, revised with follow-up (M-CHAT-R/F) for potential variability based on demographic factors focusing on language and patient-reported need for interpretation. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. The study population consisted of 776 patients (mean age 25 months) with a positive M-CHAT-R/F (367 high risk, 409 moderate risk). Data collected included self-reported race, ethnicity, preferred language, interpreter need, screening results, and referrals placed at the time of screening. Patients with a prior autism spectrum disorder diagnosis were excluded. Data were analyzed using Pearson's χ2 test of independence and logistic regression to determine if demographic factors, focusing on preferred language and need for an interpreter, were associated with placement of recommended referrals. RESULTS: Among children with a positive M-CHAT-R/F screen, 69% were referred to developmental behavioral pediatrics, 76% to behavioral health, 83% for early intervention, 93% for speech therapy, and 91% for audiology. In unadjusted stratified analysis, no significant differences were found in rates of referral to recommended services in relation to race, language spoken, or interpreter need. After a logistic regression analysis, no factors were predictive of higher or lower rates of referral to any service studied. CONCLUSION: We found no disparities in referrals after a positive M-CHAT-R/F in relation to preferred language or interpreter need. Further research could examine what factors can help prevent disparities in referral placement to recommended services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/dbp.0000000000001512
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Investigation into Referrals Placed Following Positive Screening With the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised With Follow-up

Ann Levine, Brett Klamer, Kendall Abbas, Courtney Brown et al.
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

An Investigation into Referrals Placed Following Positive Screening With the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised With Follow-up

Ann Levine, Brett Klamer, Kendall Abbas, Courtney Brown, Elizabeth Barnhardt, Katherine Steingass, Mary A. Abrams
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine referral practices after positive autism spectrum disorder screening with the modified checklist for autism in toddlers, revised with follow-up (M-CHAT-R/F) for potential variability based on demographic factors focusing on language and patient-reported need for interpretation. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. The study population consisted of 776 patients (mean age 25 months) with a positive M-CHAT-R/F (367 high risk, 409 moderate risk). Data collected included self-reported race, ethnicity, preferred language, interpreter need, screening results, and referrals placed at the time of screening. Patients with a prior autism spectrum disorder diagnosis were excluded. Data were analyzed using Pearson's χ2 test of independence and logistic regression to determine if demographic factors, focusing on preferred language and need for an interpreter, were associated with placement of recommended referrals. RESULTS: Among children with a positive M-CHAT-R/F screen, 69% were referred to developmental behavioral pediatrics, 76% to behavioral health, 83% for early intervention, 93% for speech therapy, and 91% for audiology. In unadjusted stratified analysis, no significant differences were found in rates of referral to recommended services in relation to race, language spoken, or interpreter need. After a logistic regression analysis, no factors were predictive of higher or lower rates of referral to any service studied. CONCLUSION: We found no disparities in referrals after a positive M-CHAT-R/F in relation to preferred language or interpreter need. Further research could examine what factors can help prevent disparities in referral placement to recommended services.

Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Ohio State University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.