Skeletal Muscles Do Not Compete for Growth: Activating Additional Muscle Mass Does Not Compromise Changes in Muscle Size

ABSTRACT: Kataoka, R, Yamada, Y, Hammert, WB, Sallberg, RW, Kang, A, Song, JS, Kassiano, W, Metcalf, EE, and Loenneke, JP. Skeletal muscles do not compete for growth: Activating additional muscle mass does not compromise changes in muscle size. J Strength Cond Res 40(9): 1043-1049, 2026-This study investigated whether the magnitude of muscle size and strength differed based on the amount of muscle recruited during training sessions. One hundred five untrained individuals were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: low-load unilateral elbow flexion exercise (a) to failure (LL-Failure, n = 36), (b) to failure and low-load knee extension exercise to failure (LL-Failure + Legs, n = 33), or (c) a time-matched nonexercise control (CON, n = 36). Training groups completed 18 supervised sessions over 6 weeks (2 sets at 30% 1 repetition maximum [1RM] to failure). LL-Failure + Legs group performed 4 additional sets of knee extension exercise in each leg (20-30 RM). Muscle thickness on the anterior upper arm (60 and 70% sites) and elbow flexor 1RM strength of the trained arm were measured at pretesting and posttesting. Changes were compared using the ANCOVA function of Bayes Factors for Informative Hypotheses (prevalues as the covariate). Specific hypotheses were evaluated by comparing Bayes factors and the posterior probabilities between models. Six weeks of training led to increases in muscle size and strength. However, performing additional leg exercise did not attenuate the muscle growth in the anterior upper arm (0.19 cm) compared with performing only arm exercise to failure (0.18 cm). Changes in 1RM strength also did not differ between training groups (0.32 and 0.25 kg for LL-Failure and LL-Failure + Legs, respectively). Overall, there was no evidence for competition of adaptations in muscle size and strength under uncontrolled nutritional conditions. Whether greater training volume or limited nutrient intake induces a competition for resources warrants further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005439
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Skeletal Muscles Do Not Compete for Growth: Activating Additional Muscle Mass Does Not Compromise Changes in Muscle Size

William B. Hammert, Witalo Kassiano, Ryo Kataoka, Anna Kang et al.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Sports injuries and prevention
article

Skeletal Muscles Do Not Compete for Growth: Activating Additional Muscle Mass Does Not Compromise Changes in Muscle Size

William B. Hammert, Witalo Kassiano, Ryo Kataoka, Anna Kang, JP Loenneke, Jun Song, Robert W. Sallberg, Yujiro Yamada, Emily E. Metcalf
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Kataoka, R, Yamada, Y, Hammert, WB, Sallberg, RW, Kang, A, Song, JS, Kassiano, W, Metcalf, EE, and Loenneke, JP. Skeletal muscles do not compete for growth: Activating additional muscle mass does not compromise changes in muscle size. J Strength Cond Res 40(9): 1043-1049, 2026-This study investigated whether the magnitude of muscle size and strength differed based on the amount of muscle recruited during training sessions. One hundred five untrained individuals were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: low-load unilateral elbow flexion exercise (a) to failure (LL-Failure, n = 36), (b) to failure and low-load knee extension exercise to failure (LL-Failure + Legs, n = 33), or (c) a time-matched nonexercise control (CON, n = 36). Training groups completed 18 supervised sessions over 6 weeks (2 sets at 30% 1 repetition maximum [1RM] to failure). LL-Failure + Legs group performed 4 additional sets of knee extension exercise in each leg (20-30 RM). Muscle thickness on the anterior upper arm (60 and 70% sites) and elbow flexor 1RM strength of the trained arm were measured at pretesting and posttesting. Changes were compared using the ANCOVA function of Bayes Factors for Informative Hypotheses (prevalues as the covariate). Specific hypotheses were evaluated by comparing Bayes factors and the posterior probabilities between models. Six weeks of training led to increases in muscle size and strength. However, performing additional leg exercise did not attenuate the muscle growth in the anterior upper arm (0.19 cm) compared with performing only arm exercise to failure (0.18 cm). Changes in 1RM strength also did not differ between training groups (0.32 and 0.25 kg for LL-Failure and LL-Failure + Legs, respectively). Overall, there was no evidence for competition of adaptations in muscle size and strength under uncontrolled nutritional conditions. Whether greater training volume or limited nutrient intake induces a competition for resources warrants further investigation.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchVol. 40(9)
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR), Texas A&M University – San Antonio (US), University of Mississippi (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sports injuries and prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.