Comparing Pressure, Force, and Contact Area over the Projected Median Nerve Region Across Cycling Glove Conditions: A Pilot Study

Background/Objectives: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a prevalent neuropathy often associated with repetitive wrist movements, sustained wrist postures, and external compression. Although cycling offers numerous health benefits, prolonged handlebar contact may contribute to hand/wrist discomfort and cycling-related neuropathies. As a pilot study, the aim of this work was intended to (1) evaluate the feasibility of using pressure mapping to quantify glove-related pressure redistribution during cycling; (2) identify key confounding variables requiring improved control in future studies, including comfort/discomfort, posture, cycling experience, hand position, and anthropometric variability; and (3) provide preliminary estimates of pressure variability and effect magnitude between bare hands, conventional biking gloves, and Shock·Tek™ gloves to inform a larger confirmatory study. Methods: Thirteen right-handed adults were tested during low-intensity cycling using a stationary bike equipped with a pliance®-x pressure sensor wrapped around the handlebar under three conditions: no gloves, traditional padded gloves, and Shock·Tek™ gloves. Results: This exploratory pilot study (1) demonstrated the feasibility of using pressure mapping, (2) identified confounding variables, and (3) showed that while traditional gloves did not significantly reduce surface pressure in the projected median nerve region as we hypothesized, the Shock·Tek™ gloves yielded a 61% reduction in pressure (mean: 20.23 kPa vs. 51.96 kPa with no gloves). Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that glove design can influence surface pressure distribution over the projected median nerve region at the hand–glove–handlebar interface during short-duration stationary cycling.