Suture Button Syndesmosis Repair Augmented With Nonanatomic vs Anatomic AITFL Reconstruction and the Added Effect of Deltoid Repair: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

BACKGROUND: Optimal fixation methods for syndesmosis injuries remain debated. The anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) is critical for syndesmosis stability. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically evaluate a suture button (SB) repair of syndesmosis injuries augmented with the tails of the SB construct vs an AITFL suture augmentation, and to measure the effect of deltoid ligament repair in limiting ankle external rotation (ER). METHODS: This controlled laboratory study used 13 cadaveric lower-leg specimens with robotic forces of 10 Nm internal and external torque under 750 N of axial compression. Each specimen underwent 8 testing surgical states: (1) native/uninjured; (2) sectioned syndesmosis with a sectioned interosseous ligament, AITFL, and posterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament; (3) fully sectioned including deep deltoid ligament; (4) syndesmosis repair with SB construct; (5) added AITFL repair using suture tails repair (SB+tails); (6) added deltoid repair with AITFL tails and syndesmosis repairs (SB+tails+deltoid repair); (7) AITFL augmentation with syndesmosis repair (SB+AITFL augmentation); and (8) additional deltoid repair with AITFL augmentation and syndesmosis repair (SB+AITFL augmentation+deltoid). RESULTS: > .99). CONCLUSION: Both the SB+AITFL tails and SB+AITFL augmentation demonstrated improvements in ankle stability over SB alone; with the numbers available, no significant difference between these methods could be detected. However, no repair construct fully restored external ankle rotation to the native state. The deltoid suture repair added medial stability to both SB+AITFL tails and SB+AITFL augmentation. All absolute differences between constructs were small (fractions of a degree or millimeter), and findings should be interpreted accordingly. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory studyClinical Relevance:This study found that, in this cadaveric model, augmenting the AITFL using either method in addition to suture button placement and open deltoid repair was associated with ankle stability approaching preinjury values across most biomechanical measures tested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle International
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007261468351
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Suture Button Syndesmosis Repair Augmented With Nonanatomic vs Anatomic AITFL Reconstruction and the Added Effect of Deltoid Repair: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

Jeffrey D. Seybold, Bryan D. Den Hartog, William M. Engasser, Paul M. Cammack et al.
Foot & Ankle International
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Suture Button Syndesmosis Repair Augmented With Nonanatomic vs Anatomic AITFL Reconstruction and the Added Effect of Deltoid Repair: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

Jeffrey D. Seybold, Bryan D. Den Hartog, William M. Engasser, Paul M. Cammack, J. Chris Coetzee, Rebecca Stone McGaver, R C Moen, Mitchell Carlson, Evan P Shoemaker, Patrick H. Donaghue, Caroline Chen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimal fixation methods for syndesmosis injuries remain debated. The anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) is critical for syndesmosis stability. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically evaluate a suture button (SB) repair of syndesmosis injuries augmented with the tails of the SB construct vs an AITFL suture augmentation, and to measure the effect of deltoid ligament repair in limiting ankle external rotation (ER). METHODS: This controlled laboratory study used 13 cadaveric lower-leg specimens with robotic forces of 10 Nm internal and external torque under 750 N of axial compression. Each specimen underwent 8 testing surgical states: (1) native/uninjured; (2) sectioned syndesmosis with a sectioned interosseous ligament, AITFL, and posterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament; (3) fully sectioned including deep deltoid ligament; (4) syndesmosis repair with SB construct; (5) added AITFL repair using suture tails repair (SB+tails); (6) added deltoid repair with AITFL tails and syndesmosis repairs (SB+tails+deltoid repair); (7) AITFL augmentation with syndesmosis repair (SB+AITFL augmentation); and (8) additional deltoid repair with AITFL augmentation and syndesmosis repair (SB+AITFL augmentation+deltoid). RESULTS: > .99). CONCLUSION: Both the SB+AITFL tails and SB+AITFL augmentation demonstrated improvements in ankle stability over SB alone; with the numbers available, no significant difference between these methods could be detected. However, no repair construct fully restored external ankle rotation to the native state. The deltoid suture repair added medial stability to both SB+AITFL tails and SB+AITFL augmentation. All absolute differences between constructs were small (fractions of a degree or millimeter), and findings should be interpreted accordingly. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory studyClinical Relevance:This study found that, in this cadaveric model, augmenting the AITFL using either method in addition to suture button placement and open deltoid repair was associated with ankle stability approaching preinjury values across most biomechanical measures tested.

Foot & Ankle International
Twin Cities Orthopedics (US), University of Minnesota Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.