Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Elderly Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Background/Objectives: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has substantially advanced perioperative care across multiple surgical disciplines. Research in colorectal surgery has clearly demonstrated the effectiveness of ERAS programs; however, evidence regarding the application of these protocols in elderly patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery remains limited. This population has a high prevalence of multimorbidity, frailty, and diminished physiological reserve, factors that collectively increase vulnerability to postoperative complications and may influence adherence to ERAS pathways. Methods: This narrative review is based on a structured literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between 2000 and 2025. The search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, meta-analyses, and clinical guidelines evaluating ERAS protocols in elderly patients undergoing upper GI surgery. Results: Available evidence indicates that ERAS protocols are feasible and safe in elderly patients undergoing upper GI surgery, including gastrectomy and esophagectomy. Studies consistently associate their implementation with shorter hospital stays, faster gastrointestinal recovery, and no significant increase in postoperative complications or readmission rates. However, heterogeneity in study designs, ERAS components, and definitions of ‘elderly’ limits comparability across studies. Conclusions: ERAS protocols represent a promising perioperative strategy for elderly patients undergoing upper GI surgery. When implemented within a multidisciplinary framework and tailored to patients’ frailty and comorbidities, these protocols may improve postoperative recovery while maintaining safety. Future research should prioritize multicenter RCTs to identify the most effective ERAS components and evaluate long-term clinical and functional outcomes in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgeries
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries7030100
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Elderly Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Giuseppe Palomba, Marianna Capuano, Giovanni Aprea, Alessandra Lucia Simeone et al.
Surgeries
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
article

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Elderly Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Giuseppe Palomba, Marianna Capuano, Giovanni Aprea, Alessandra Lucia Simeone, Emanuele Alfonso Campitiello
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has substantially advanced perioperative care across multiple surgical disciplines. Research in colorectal surgery has clearly demonstrated the effectiveness of ERAS programs; however, evidence regarding the application of these protocols in elderly patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery remains limited. This population has a high prevalence of multimorbidity, frailty, and diminished physiological reserve, factors that collectively increase vulnerability to postoperative complications and may influence adherence to ERAS pathways. Methods: This narrative review is based on a structured literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between 2000 and 2025. The search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, meta-analyses, and clinical guidelines evaluating ERAS protocols in elderly patients undergoing upper GI surgery. Results: Available evidence indicates that ERAS protocols are feasible and safe in elderly patients undergoing upper GI surgery, including gastrectomy and esophagectomy. Studies consistently associate their implementation with shorter hospital stays, faster gastrointestinal recovery, and no significant increase in postoperative complications or readmission rates. However, heterogeneity in study designs, ERAS components, and definitions of ‘elderly’ limits comparability across studies. Conclusions: ERAS protocols represent a promising perioperative strategy for elderly patients undergoing upper GI surgery. When implemented within a multidisciplinary framework and tailored to patients’ frailty and comorbidities, these protocols may improve postoperative recovery while maintaining safety. Future research should prioritize multicenter RCTs to identify the most effective ERAS components and evaluate long-term clinical and functional outcomes in this population.

SurgeriesVol. 7(3)
Federico II University Hospital (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.