The Leiden–Nice Consensus (2024–2025)—Technical Standardization and Clinical Algorithms for Pulsed Radiofrequency for Chronic Pain

Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) has emerged as a safe, minimally invasive clinical strategy for the management of acute and chronic pain syndromes. Over the past two decades, its range of clinical applications has expanded across spinal, peripheral nerves, and intra-articular interventions. Despite the growing evidence supporting the clinical efficacy of PRF, two major challenges remain: (a) the lack of standardized technical parameters and the absence of structured clinical algorithms guiding physicians in selecting the targets and therapeutic strategies. In April 2024, an international panel of pain specialists convened in Leiden, the Netherlands to propose standardized technical guidelines for PRF procedures, resulting in the Leiden Consensus 2024, which focuses on reproducible parameters such as voltage, exposure time, electrode configuration, and procedural technique. Subsequently, during expert consensus discussions held in Nice, France, in 2025, the same international workgroup addressed a second critical gap in the field: clinical decision-making in interventional pain management. The Nice 2025 Consensus therefore developed practical diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms for common chronic pain conditions, including cervical facet pain, shoulder pain, knee osteoarthritis, sacroiliac pain, hip pain, thoracic pain, and central sensitization syndromes. This integrated consensus manuscript combines both initiatives into a comprehensive clinical framework. The Leiden Consensus proposes reproducible technical standards for PRF procedures, while the Nice Consensus provides stepwise clinical pathways emphasizing diagnosis-driven interventions and prioritizing nondestructive neuromodulation strategies. A central principle of the consensus is that PRF may be considered the first-line interventional treatment for peripheral nerve-related chronic noncancer pain, reserving ablative radiofrequency techniques for cases that are refractory to neuromodulation. The present document represents a living consensus intended to guide clinical practice worldwide while stimulating future research and evidence generation in the rapidly evolving field of PRF pain therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pain and Therapy
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-026-00885-0
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Leiden–Nice Consensus (2024–2025)—Technical Standardization and Clinical Algorithms for Pulsed Radiofrequency for Chronic Pain

Luis Josino Brasil, Tolga Ergönenç, Paulo Renato Barreiros da Fonseca, Daniel de Moraes Ferreira Jorge et al.
Pain and Therapy
Pain Management and Treatment
article

The Leiden–Nice Consensus (2024–2025)—Technical Standardization and Clinical Algorithms for Pulsed Radiofrequency for Chronic Pain

Luis Josino Brasil, Tolga Ergönenç, Paulo Renato Barreiros da Fonseca, Daniel de Moraes Ferreira Jorge, Ahmed Elhalwagy, Olav Rohof, Jonas Lenzi de Araujo, Alexandre Teixeira, Francesca Marsili
article en

Abstract

Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) has emerged as a safe, minimally invasive clinical strategy for the management of acute and chronic pain syndromes. Over the past two decades, its range of clinical applications has expanded across spinal, peripheral nerves, and intra-articular interventions. Despite the growing evidence supporting the clinical efficacy of PRF, two major challenges remain: (a) the lack of standardized technical parameters and the absence of structured clinical algorithms guiding physicians in selecting the targets and therapeutic strategies. In April 2024, an international panel of pain specialists convened in Leiden, the Netherlands to propose standardized technical guidelines for PRF procedures, resulting in the Leiden Consensus 2024, which focuses on reproducible parameters such as voltage, exposure time, electrode configuration, and procedural technique. Subsequently, during expert consensus discussions held in Nice, France, in 2025, the same international workgroup addressed a second critical gap in the field: clinical decision-making in interventional pain management. The Nice 2025 Consensus therefore developed practical diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms for common chronic pain conditions, including cervical facet pain, shoulder pain, knee osteoarthritis, sacroiliac pain, hip pain, thoracic pain, and central sensitization syndromes. This integrated consensus manuscript combines both initiatives into a comprehensive clinical framework. The Leiden Consensus proposes reproducible technical standards for PRF procedures, while the Nice Consensus provides stepwise clinical pathways emphasizing diagnosis-driven interventions and prioritizing nondestructive neuromodulation strategies. A central principle of the consensus is that PRF may be considered the first-line interventional treatment for peripheral nerve-related chronic noncancer pain, reserving ablative radiofrequency techniques for cases that are refractory to neuromodulation. The present document represents a living consensus intended to guide clinical practice worldwide while stimulating future research and evidence generation in the rapidly evolving field of PRF pain therapy.

Pain and Therapy
Sakarya University (TR), Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (BR), Universidade Politécnica de Viana do Castelo (PT), Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Sakarya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Groene Hart Ziekenhuis (NL), Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia (BR), University of Amsterdam (NL), Sohag University (EG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pain Management and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.