The Dual Face of Gingival Mesenchymal Stem Cell Paracrine Signalling in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Pro-Tumour Transcriptional Programme and a Hypothesis-Generating Drug-Repurposing Screen

Background: In our companion study, the gingival mesenchymal stem cell (GMSC) secretome suppresses oxidative stress and induces apoptosis in primary oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cells, where those wet-lab results are themselves reported as preliminary; here we ask whether it also engages a proliferation × migration programme in patient tissue. The two arms differ in read-out type (apoptosis and redox there, transcript abundance here), not in opposed function. Methods: Primary OSCC cells received GMSC-conditioned medium (GMSC-CM) or indirect Transwell co-culture, assayed by RT-qPCR (VEGFA, TGFB1, MMP9, CXCL12, CCND1, PCNA, MYC, EGFR), MTT, and scratch-wound migration. Thirteen computational layers plus a GeoMx spatial verify-and-decide layer were applied to public data: TCGA-HNSC, GEO, CPTAC, single-cell inference, prognostic modelling, DepMap and LINCS L1000. Results: All eight transcripts were raised in all three arms (16 of 24 comparisons significant), indicating a pro-tumour transcriptional shift; metabolic activity was unchanged and wound closure was reduced under conditioned medium (p < 0.01). Of 1358 genes significant in all three modalities, 1219 (89.8%, 95% CI 88.0–91.3%) share direction against 25.0% expected by chance (3.59-fold; exact binomial p below machine precision). The pre-registered oral-cavity signature did not validate externally (GSE41613; C = 0.562), and no ligand–receptor pair survived permutation calibration. Conclusions: GMSC paracrine exposure induces a pro-tumour transcriptional programme in primary OSCC cells that replicates at patient level, without demonstrated functional or therapeutic consequence; gefitinib is nominated only as a hypothesis-generating candidate. The evidence rests on three primary cultures (n = 3), one GMSC donor preparation, one 24 h time point, a single reference gene, no cell-line authentication and no test of gefitinib; the study programme has concluded, and these experiments cannot be performed now.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cells
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15171538
Primary Topic
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Dual Face of Gingival Mesenchymal Stem Cell Paracrine Signalling in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Pro-Tumour Transcriptional Programme and a Hypothesis-Generating Drug-Repurposing Screen

Jagadish Hosmani, Abdullah Alqarni, Saeed Arem, Shankargouda Patil et al.
Cells
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
article

The Dual Face of Gingival Mesenchymal Stem Cell Paracrine Signalling in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Pro-Tumour Transcriptional Programme and a Hypothesis-Generating Drug-Repurposing Screen

Jagadish Hosmani, Abdullah Alqarni, Saeed Arem, Shankargouda Patil, Rayan Mohammedfarooq Meer, HUSSAIN ALMUBARAK, Hassan Ahmed Assiri
article en

Abstract

Background: In our companion study, the gingival mesenchymal stem cell (GMSC) secretome suppresses oxidative stress and induces apoptosis in primary oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cells, where those wet-lab results are themselves reported as preliminary; here we ask whether it also engages a proliferation × migration programme in patient tissue. The two arms differ in read-out type (apoptosis and redox there, transcript abundance here), not in opposed function. Methods: Primary OSCC cells received GMSC-conditioned medium (GMSC-CM) or indirect Transwell co-culture, assayed by RT-qPCR (VEGFA, TGFB1, MMP9, CXCL12, CCND1, PCNA, MYC, EGFR), MTT, and scratch-wound migration. Thirteen computational layers plus a GeoMx spatial verify-and-decide layer were applied to public data: TCGA-HNSC, GEO, CPTAC, single-cell inference, prognostic modelling, DepMap and LINCS L1000. Results: All eight transcripts were raised in all three arms (16 of 24 comparisons significant), indicating a pro-tumour transcriptional shift; metabolic activity was unchanged and wound closure was reduced under conditioned medium (p < 0.01). Of 1358 genes significant in all three modalities, 1219 (89.8%, 95% CI 88.0–91.3%) share direction against 25.0% expected by chance (3.59-fold; exact binomial p below machine precision). The pre-registered oral-cavity signature did not validate externally (GSE41613; C = 0.562), and no ligand–receptor pair survived permutation calibration. Conclusions: GMSC paracrine exposure induces a pro-tumour transcriptional programme in primary OSCC cells that replicates at patient level, without demonstrated functional or therapeutic consequence; gefitinib is nominated only as a hypothesis-generating candidate. The evidence rests on three primary cultures (n = 3), one GMSC donor preparation, one 24 h time point, a single reference gene, no cell-line authentication and no test of gefitinib; the study programme has concluded, and these experiments cannot be performed now.

CellsVol. 15(17)
Roseman University of Health Sciences (US), Taibah University (SA), King Khalid University (SA)
King Khalid University
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.