Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients treated with commercial chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE: To characterize physician-reported prescribing patterns and referral pathways for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), and to describe treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients receiving commercial ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel). METHODS: This study comprised a descriptive physician survey and retrospective medical chart review. Seventeen physicians representing geographically diverse private community practices (82.4%) and academic centers (17.6%) completed a standardized questionnaire addressing CAR-T referral patterns and perceived barriers. Medical records of 72 adult patients with RRMM who received cilta-cel between February 28, 2022, and June 30, 2024, following US Food and Drug Administration approval, were abstracted to evaluate treatment pathways and clinical outcomes; safety data were not captured. RESULTS: Physicians reported treating 289 patients who were eligible for CAR-T therapy in the past year; 52.9% indicated that 31%-50% of eligible patients were not referred. For referred patients, efficacy of therapy (76.5%) and good performance status/low frailty (64.7%) were top reasons for referral, whereas patient choice (52.9%), poor performance status/high frailty (47.1%), comorbidity burden (41.2%), and older age (41.2%) were primary reasons for nonreferral. Among the 72 patients who received cilta-cel, approximately half (55.6%) traveled >30 miles to treatment centers, and 27.8% relocated for treatment. In those with a response assessment, the overall response rate was 95.2% and 60.3% achieved at least a complete response. At the end of follow-up (median: 5.6 months), 86.1% were alive, of whom 43.5% achieved remission and were not receiving active treatment. CONCLUSION: This real-world study adds to the body of evidence on decision-making for use of commercial CAR-T therapies and supports the development of clinical best practices and guidelines, payer decisions, and health system planning for CAR-T treatment in RRMM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2026.2717477
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients treated with commercial chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Matthew Brunner, Angele Kotomale, Suzanne Fanning, Talia Miller et al.
Current Medical Research and Opinion
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients treated with commercial chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Matthew Brunner, Angele Kotomale, Suzanne Fanning, Talia Miller, Denise De Wiest, Oluwabunmi Emidio, Matthew Perciavalle, George Nahas, Rafael Fonseca, Zaina P. Qureshi, Bruce Feinberg, Saurabh P. Nagar
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize physician-reported prescribing patterns and referral pathways for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), and to describe treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients receiving commercial ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel). METHODS: This study comprised a descriptive physician survey and retrospective medical chart review. Seventeen physicians representing geographically diverse private community practices (82.4%) and academic centers (17.6%) completed a standardized questionnaire addressing CAR-T referral patterns and perceived barriers. Medical records of 72 adult patients with RRMM who received cilta-cel between February 28, 2022, and June 30, 2024, following US Food and Drug Administration approval, were abstracted to evaluate treatment pathways and clinical outcomes; safety data were not captured. RESULTS: Physicians reported treating 289 patients who were eligible for CAR-T therapy in the past year; 52.9% indicated that 31%-50% of eligible patients were not referred. For referred patients, efficacy of therapy (76.5%) and good performance status/low frailty (64.7%) were top reasons for referral, whereas patient choice (52.9%), poor performance status/high frailty (47.1%), comorbidity burden (41.2%), and older age (41.2%) were primary reasons for nonreferral. Among the 72 patients who received cilta-cel, approximately half (55.6%) traveled >30 miles to treatment centers, and 27.8% relocated for treatment. In those with a response assessment, the overall response rate was 95.2% and 60.3% achieved at least a complete response. At the end of follow-up (median: 5.6 months), 86.1% were alive, of whom 43.5% achieved remission and were not receiving active treatment. CONCLUSION: This real-world study adds to the body of evidence on decision-making for use of commercial CAR-T therapies and supports the development of clinical best practices and guidelines, payer decisions, and health system planning for CAR-T treatment in RRMM.

Current Medical Research and Opinion
Prisma Health (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Cancer Institute (WIA) (IN), 490 BioTech (United States) (US), Baptist Health South Florida (US), Mayo Clinic Hospital (US), Johnson & Johnson (Israel) (IL), Cardinal Health (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.