A natural history model of oesophageal adenocarcinoma to inform power calculations for the BEST4 screening trial

ObjectiveOesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) has a poor prognosis, often due to its late stage at diagnosis. Individuals diagnosed with Barrett's oesophagus (BO), a precursor condition to OAC, are offered surveillance with the goal of identifying and treating dysplastic BO, preventing progression to cancer. The BEST4 Screening randomised controlled trial was designed to demonstrate a reduction in (i) incidence of stage II + or fatal OAC and (ii) OAC mortality through targeted capsule sponge screening in high-risk individuals. Here we describe the simple natural history model we developed to inform the sample size calculation for the BEST4 screening trial.MethodsWe considered a range of annual transition probabilities between states to evaluate the impact on the incidence of (i) stage II + or fatal OAC and (ii) OAC mortality, and therefore the statistical power to identify a reduction in each of these endpoints. We additionally considered a range of baseline prevalences for each state, as well as for screening uptake, capsule sponge sensitivity and treatment efficacy.ResultsUnder the assumptions considered, the BEST4 trial will have >90% power to detect a difference in incidence of stage II + or fatal OAC by 5.5 years, and mortality by 7.5 years, under most parameter combinations, and by 8.5 years and 12 years, respectively, under all combinations. The model is freely available to download.ConclusionA simple semi-Markov natural history model can be used to explore the power of a clinical trial with group-sequential analysis under a wide range of scenarios regarding the natural history of disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Screening
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413261478764
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A natural history model of oesophageal adenocarcinoma to inform power calculations for the BEST4 screening trial

Peter David Sasieni, Rebecca C. Fitzgerald, John W. Correira, Rebecca Landy
Journal of Medical Screening
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

A natural history model of oesophageal adenocarcinoma to inform power calculations for the BEST4 screening trial

Peter David Sasieni, Rebecca C. Fitzgerald, John W. Correira, Rebecca Landy
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveOesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) has a poor prognosis, often due to its late stage at diagnosis. Individuals diagnosed with Barrett's oesophagus (BO), a precursor condition to OAC, are offered surveillance with the goal of identifying and treating dysplastic BO, preventing progression to cancer. The BEST4 Screening randomised controlled trial was designed to demonstrate a reduction in (i) incidence of stage II + or fatal OAC and (ii) OAC mortality through targeted capsule sponge screening in high-risk individuals. Here we describe the simple natural history model we developed to inform the sample size calculation for the BEST4 screening trial.MethodsWe considered a range of annual transition probabilities between states to evaluate the impact on the incidence of (i) stage II + or fatal OAC and (ii) OAC mortality, and therefore the statistical power to identify a reduction in each of these endpoints. We additionally considered a range of baseline prevalences for each state, as well as for screening uptake, capsule sponge sensitivity and treatment efficacy.ResultsUnder the assumptions considered, the BEST4 trial will have >90% power to detect a difference in incidence of stage II + or fatal OAC by 5.5 years, and mortality by 7.5 years, under most parameter combinations, and by 8.5 years and 12 years, respectively, under all combinations. The model is freely available to download.ConclusionA simple semi-Markov natural history model can be used to explore the power of a clinical trial with group-sequential analysis under a wide range of scenarios regarding the natural history of disease.

Journal of Medical Screening
American Cancer Society (US), Emory University (US), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Cancer Research UK (GB), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Cancer Research UK Cambridge Center (GB)
American Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.