How to measure environmental concern: an IRT evaluation and advancement of established survey scales

Measuring environmental concern is central to environmental public opinion research, yet the field lacks a comprehensive and consistent approach. Existing measures are limited by a lack of theoretical consensus, scarce validation, outdated wording, and, limited precision at the upper end of the scale. We address these limitations by developing and validating a refined measure, defining environmental concern as people’s affective, cognitive, and conative positions toward human-induced problems and their willingness to solve them. Using Item Response Theory on a large, representative Swiss sample (N = 7932), we assess 36 established survey questions to identify validated items with high measurement quality that reflect our theoretical interest. We select the best-performing items and validate their power to predict pro-environmental behavior and policy support. We propose a new, precise combination of established survey items that significantly improves measurement at high levels of environmental concern and offer practical recommendations for survey researchers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Politics
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2026.2718610
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to measure environmental concern: an IRT evaluation and advancement of established survey scales

Franziska Quoß, Sarah Gomm
Environmental Politics
Environmental Education and Sustainability
article

How to measure environmental concern: an IRT evaluation and advancement of established survey scales

Franziska Quoß, Sarah Gomm
article en

Abstract

Measuring environmental concern is central to environmental public opinion research, yet the field lacks a comprehensive and consistent approach. Existing measures are limited by a lack of theoretical consensus, scarce validation, outdated wording, and, limited precision at the upper end of the scale. We address these limitations by developing and validating a refined measure, defining environmental concern as people’s affective, cognitive, and conative positions toward human-induced problems and their willingness to solve them. Using Item Response Theory on a large, representative Swiss sample (N = 7932), we assess 36 established survey questions to identify validated items with high measurement quality that reflect our theoretical interest. We select the best-performing items and validate their power to predict pro-environmental behavior and policy support. We propose a new, precise combination of established survey items that significantly improves measurement at high levels of environmental concern and offer practical recommendations for survey researchers.

Environmental Politics
CBS University of Applied Sciences (DE), ETH Zurich (CH)
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.