Improving accuracy and precision of TLS-derived gap fraction: Comprehensive evaluation of acquisition and synthesis parameters

Gap fraction serves as a fundamental variable for quantifying forest light availability and deriving key canopy structural metrics. Hemispherical photography has been the standard method for gap fraction estimation, but has limited capacity to quantify three-dimensional stand architecture and light gradients. The advance of terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) overcomes these limitations by capturing complete 3D structural information. However, TLS-derived gap fraction is sensitive to acquisition and synthesis parameters, and wind-induced canopy movement during scanning may further compromise the reliability of these estimates. We evaluated how these parameters influence the accuracy and precision of TLS-derived gap fraction across a canopy density gradient. We generated 19,968 synthetic hemispherical images from eight TLS configurations, including angular resolution (ar12: 175 million points; ar14: 44 million points), scanning mode (single vs. multi-scan), scan quality (q1–q6, corresponding to 3–30 minutes per station), beam divergence (0.01–0.21°), and image resolution (2000–20000 pixels). We compared TLS estimates against reference hemispherical photography to quantify bias (accuracy) and variance (precision). Point cloud density of single-scan largely determined multi-scan effectiveness, with ar12 achieving significantly higher accuracy than ar14 (error: 0.12 vs. 0.20). Beam divergence dominated estimation accuracy, with 0.09° as optimal. High scan quality eliminated precision benefits due to wind-induced canopy movement. Multi-scan under moderate quality settings showed the strongest variance reductions, especially at high zenith angles. Our findings demonstrate that adequate single-scan point density amplifies multi-scan benefits rather than simply relying on multiple scan positions to compensate for sparse sampling. We recommend prioritizing angular resolution over scan duration and applying moderate beam divergence to optimize estimation accuracy, precision, and field efficiency. These results provide practical guidance for TLS data acquisition and highlight the necessity of parameter configuration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2026.111448
Primary Topic
Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving accuracy and precision of TLS-derived gap fraction: Comprehensive evaluation of acquisition and synthesis parameters

Dexiong Teng, Deliang Lu, Fengyuan Yu, Shuangtian Li et al.
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
article

Improving accuracy and precision of TLS-derived gap fraction: Comprehensive evaluation of acquisition and synthesis parameters

Dexiong Teng, Deliang Lu, Fengyuan Yu, Shuangtian Li, Jiaojun Zhu, Huaiqing Zhang, Jianbo Qi, Yue Yu, Changfu Liu, Yu Sun, Tian Gao, Jinxin Zhang, Mengmeng Gou
article en

Abstract

Gap fraction serves as a fundamental variable for quantifying forest light availability and deriving key canopy structural metrics. Hemispherical photography has been the standard method for gap fraction estimation, but has limited capacity to quantify three-dimensional stand architecture and light gradients. The advance of terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) overcomes these limitations by capturing complete 3D structural information. However, TLS-derived gap fraction is sensitive to acquisition and synthesis parameters, and wind-induced canopy movement during scanning may further compromise the reliability of these estimates. We evaluated how these parameters influence the accuracy and precision of TLS-derived gap fraction across a canopy density gradient. We generated 19,968 synthetic hemispherical images from eight TLS configurations, including angular resolution (ar12: 175 million points; ar14: 44 million points), scanning mode (single vs. multi-scan), scan quality (q1–q6, corresponding to 3–30 minutes per station), beam divergence (0.01–0.21°), and image resolution (2000–20000 pixels). We compared TLS estimates against reference hemispherical photography to quantify bias (accuracy) and variance (precision). Point cloud density of single-scan largely determined multi-scan effectiveness, with ar12 achieving significantly higher accuracy than ar14 (error: 0.12 vs. 0.20). Beam divergence dominated estimation accuracy, with 0.09° as optimal. High scan quality eliminated precision benefits due to wind-induced canopy movement. Multi-scan under moderate quality settings showed the strongest variance reductions, especially at high zenith angles. Our findings demonstrate that adequate single-scan point density amplifies multi-scan benefits rather than simply relying on multiple scan positions to compensate for sparse sampling. We recommend prioritizing angular resolution over scan duration and applying moderate beam divergence to optimize estimation accuracy, precision, and field efficiency. These results provide practical guidance for TLS data acquisition and highlight the necessity of parameter configuration.

Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyVol. 389
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN), Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology (CN), Institute of Applied Ecology (CN), Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques (CN), Chinese Academy of Forestry (CN), Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Youth Innovation Promotion Association
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.