Artificial Intelligence in Xenotransplantation: A Prioritized Roadmap for Early Clinical Translation, Opportunities and Challenges

Xenotransplantation represents a potential solution to the persistent global organ shortage, yet its clinical application remains stalled by complex immunologic responses, coagulation dysregulation, species-specific biology, and infectious risks. Artificial intelligence (AI) could enhance safety, accelerate decision-making, and enable precision medicine initiatives within this rapidly evolving field. However, effective implementation of AI in xenotransplantation requires approaches specifically adapted to the biological and operational complexities of cross-species transplantation. Here, we present our suggestion of a prioritized roadmap for integrating AI into early clinical xenotransplantation, based on clinical need, data availability, technical readiness, feasibility of clinician-supervised implementation, and potential impact on graft assessment and safety monitoring. Priority domains include digital pathology and imaging, machine perfusion-based viability monitoring, multimodal and multi-omics detection of graft injury and rejection, and surveillance for potential xenozoonotic infections. One of the essential prerequisites to ensure the development of reliable AI in xenotransplantation is to develop standardized definitions of xenograft injury phenotypes and ground truth datasets, which in this emerging field are currently lacking. The limitations to the application of AI in xenotransplantation, which include the lack of clinical data, species-specific differences, and delays in annotations and regulations, can be addressed via data sharing, federated learning, fairness, and validation. By combining gene-edited donors and refined immunosuppression regimens with clinically supervised, auditable, and transplant-specific, AI-based support systems, xenotransplantation could be made safer and more reproducible in the clinical arena.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Xenotransplantation
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/xen.70162
Primary Topic
Xenotransplantation and immune response
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Xenotransplantation: A Prioritized Roadmap for Early Clinical Translation, Opportunities and Challenges

Saghar Babadi, Alexandre Loupy, Raphaël Meier, Kasra Shirini et al.
Xenotransplantation
Xenotransplantation and immune response
article

Artificial Intelligence in Xenotransplantation: A Prioritized Roadmap for Early Clinical Translation, Opportunities and Challenges

Saghar Babadi, Alexandre Loupy, Raphaël Meier, Kasra Shirini, Kazuhiko Yamada, Zoe Hahn, Joseph M. Ladowski, Alexander Schulick
article en

Abstract

Xenotransplantation represents a potential solution to the persistent global organ shortage, yet its clinical application remains stalled by complex immunologic responses, coagulation dysregulation, species-specific biology, and infectious risks. Artificial intelligence (AI) could enhance safety, accelerate decision-making, and enable precision medicine initiatives within this rapidly evolving field. However, effective implementation of AI in xenotransplantation requires approaches specifically adapted to the biological and operational complexities of cross-species transplantation. Here, we present our suggestion of a prioritized roadmap for integrating AI into early clinical xenotransplantation, based on clinical need, data availability, technical readiness, feasibility of clinician-supervised implementation, and potential impact on graft assessment and safety monitoring. Priority domains include digital pathology and imaging, machine perfusion-based viability monitoring, multimodal and multi-omics detection of graft injury and rejection, and surveillance for potential xenozoonotic infections. One of the essential prerequisites to ensure the development of reliable AI in xenotransplantation is to develop standardized definitions of xenograft injury phenotypes and ground truth datasets, which in this emerging field are currently lacking. The limitations to the application of AI in xenotransplantation, which include the lack of clinical data, species-specific differences, and delays in annotations and regulations, can be addressed via data sharing, federated learning, fairness, and validation. By combining gene-edited donors and refined immunosuppression regimens with clinically supervised, auditable, and transplant-specific, AI-based support systems, xenotransplantation could be made safer and more reproducible in the clinical arena.

XenotransplantationVol. 33(5)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Inserm (FR), Duke University (US), Université Paris Cité (FR), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Xenotransplantation and immune response
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.