Stigmatising substance‐related language in the electronic health records of hospitalised patients after addiction consult service implementation

OBJECTIVES: Stigmatising language about patients with substance use disorders (SUD) is common in healthcare settings and negatively impacts patient care. Addiction consult services are associated with improved clinician attitudes and less stigmatising views towards patients with SUD. We investigated whether implementation of an addiction consult service at a large urban medical centre was associated with changes in prevalence of stigmatising language in the electronic health record (EHR) of hospitalised patients and examined these changes across medical training levels. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all inpatient notes in the EHR 5 years before and after Addiction Consult Service implementation. Notes were queried using string term searches for stigmatising language related to SUD. Data were aggregated by author profile type and training level focusing on medical students, residents/fellows and attending physicians. We used chi-squared tests to compare changes in the prevalence of stigmatising language. RESULTS: Overall percentage of notes containing stigmatising language decreased significantly from 7.70% before Addiction Consult Service implementation to 7.43% after (P < 0.001). Among physicians in training, medical students had a 3.11% (P < 0.001) decrease in notes containing stigmatising language and residents/fellows saw a 1.31% (P < 0.001) decrease. In contrast, stigmatising language in attending physician notes increased by 0.84% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an Addiction Consult Service was temporally associated with decreased stigmatising language in documentation by medical students and residents/fellows, suggesting that exposure and education provided by an Addiction Consult Service may have positively influenced documentation practices. Increased stigmatising language in attending physician notes highlights the need for ongoing anti-stigma education and training for practicing clinicians. These findings support the potential role of Addiction Consult Services in reshaping institutional culture around SUD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Internal Medicine Journal
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70619
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stigmatising substance‐related language in the electronic health records of hospitalised patients after addiction consult service implementation

Justin R Birge, Kristin Daniel, Alëna A. Balasanova, Ryder Cuppett
Internal Medicine Journal
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
article

Stigmatising substance‐related language in the electronic health records of hospitalised patients after addiction consult service implementation

Justin R Birge, Kristin Daniel, Alëna A. Balasanova, Ryder Cuppett
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Stigmatising language about patients with substance use disorders (SUD) is common in healthcare settings and negatively impacts patient care. Addiction consult services are associated with improved clinician attitudes and less stigmatising views towards patients with SUD. We investigated whether implementation of an addiction consult service at a large urban medical centre was associated with changes in prevalence of stigmatising language in the electronic health record (EHR) of hospitalised patients and examined these changes across medical training levels. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all inpatient notes in the EHR 5 years before and after Addiction Consult Service implementation. Notes were queried using string term searches for stigmatising language related to SUD. Data were aggregated by author profile type and training level focusing on medical students, residents/fellows and attending physicians. We used chi-squared tests to compare changes in the prevalence of stigmatising language. RESULTS: Overall percentage of notes containing stigmatising language decreased significantly from 7.70% before Addiction Consult Service implementation to 7.43% after (P < 0.001). Among physicians in training, medical students had a 3.11% (P < 0.001) decrease in notes containing stigmatising language and residents/fellows saw a 1.31% (P < 0.001) decrease. In contrast, stigmatising language in attending physician notes increased by 0.84% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an Addiction Consult Service was temporally associated with decreased stigmatising language in documentation by medical students and residents/fellows, suggesting that exposure and education provided by an Addiction Consult Service may have positively influenced documentation practices. Increased stigmatising language in attending physician notes highlights the need for ongoing anti-stigma education and training for practicing clinicians. These findings support the potential role of Addiction Consult Services in reshaping institutional culture around SUD.

Internal Medicine Journal
Nebraska Medical Center (US), University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Quality Education, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.