Narrative ‘Self-Grasping’ and Ontological Insecurity: Beijing’s Sinicisation of Tibetan and Uyghur Histories

This article interrogates the Chinese state’s pursuit of ontological security (OS) through the Sinicisation of history, conceptualised as narrative self-grasping. Drawing on Buddhist philosophy and ontological security theory, it argues that China’s quest to achieve existential stability by constructing a coherent, teleological national self – the Zhonghua minzu – paradoxically generates deeper existential insecurity. Through an analysis of Chinese historiography and Tibetan and Uyghur counter-narratives, the article demonstrates how the state’s effort to dissolve historical plurality into a singular story of national identity provokes narrative resistance. Tibetan narratives of sacred descent and distinctive history and identity, and Uyghur historiographies of endurance and moral remembrance collectively expose the fragility of the state’s existential project. By juxtaposing the state’s narrative totalisation with Buddhist critiques of attachment to illusory identity, the study reconceptualises OS as the capacity to dwell with narrative contingency rather than real ising, mastering or denying it. The article thus advances an alternative understanding of security grounded in ontological humility and plural coexistence, revealing that the more the state narrates itself into permanence, the more unstable its being becomes .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Millennium Journal of International Studies
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298261484869
Primary Topic
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Narrative ‘Self-Grasping’ and Ontological Insecurity: Beijing’s Sinicisation of Tibetan and Uyghur Histories

Tsering Topgyal
2 links
Millennium Journal of International Studies
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
article

Narrative ‘Self-Grasping’ and Ontological Insecurity: Beijing’s Sinicisation of Tibetan and Uyghur Histories

Tsering Topgyal
article en

Abstract

This article interrogates the Chinese state’s pursuit of ontological security (OS) through the Sinicisation of history, conceptualised as narrative self-grasping. Drawing on Buddhist philosophy and ontological security theory, it argues that China’s quest to achieve existential stability by constructing a coherent, teleological national self – the Zhonghua minzu – paradoxically generates deeper existential insecurity. Through an analysis of Chinese historiography and Tibetan and Uyghur counter-narratives, the article demonstrates how the state’s effort to dissolve historical plurality into a singular story of national identity provokes narrative resistance. Tibetan narratives of sacred descent and distinctive history and identity, and Uyghur historiographies of endurance and moral remembrance collectively expose the fragility of the state’s existential project. By juxtaposing the state’s narrative totalisation with Buddhist critiques of attachment to illusory identity, the study reconceptualises OS as the capacity to dwell with narrative contingency rather than real ising, mastering or denying it. The article thus advances an alternative understanding of security grounded in ontological humility and plural coexistence, revealing that the more the state narrates itself into permanence, the more unstable its being becomes .

Millennium Journal of International Studies
University of Birmingham (GB)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon