The ethics of artificial intelligence in sport

Abstract What reason, if any, is there to object to the use of Artificial Intelligence in sport? While the existing literature has investigated several issues about the ethics of AI in sport, these studies have tended to focus on how general worries about AI such as transparency, privacy, bias, impacts on human rights and inequalities that may arise or be exacerbated by the use of AI in sport [13, 44, 58]. In this paper, we will take a different approach by asking how such technologies may change the excellences that a sport is testing and developing. After identifying failures in existent arguments for analogous cases of proscription, we offer a novel framework for understanding proscription. We argue that the introduction of a novel technology risks changing the cluster of excellences that a sport is testing and promoting. Focusing on the strategic and tactical thinking of the coach in football, we argued that the cluster of excellences in football would be contracted if this were outsourced to AI systems. We will argue that this shows the need for a widespread debate involving those involved in sport about whether to allow sports to be transformed in this way or not.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-01288-9
Primary Topic
Doping in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ethics of artificial intelligence in sport

Jack Casey, Alfred Archer
AI and Ethics
Doping in Sports
article

The ethics of artificial intelligence in sport

Jack Casey, Alfred Archer
article en

Abstract

Abstract What reason, if any, is there to object to the use of Artificial Intelligence in sport? While the existing literature has investigated several issues about the ethics of AI in sport, these studies have tended to focus on how general worries about AI such as transparency, privacy, bias, impacts on human rights and inequalities that may arise or be exacerbated by the use of AI in sport [13, 44, 58]. In this paper, we will take a different approach by asking how such technologies may change the excellences that a sport is testing and developing. After identifying failures in existent arguments for analogous cases of proscription, we offer a novel framework for understanding proscription. We argue that the introduction of a novel technology risks changing the cluster of excellences that a sport is testing and promoting. Focusing on the strategic and tactical thinking of the coach in football, we argued that the cluster of excellences in football would be contracted if this were outsourced to AI systems. We will argue that this shows the need for a widespread debate involving those involved in sport about whether to allow sports to be transformed in this way or not.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(5)
Tilburg University (NL), University of Cambridge (GB), Leverhulme Trust (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Doping in Sports
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The ethics of artificial intelligence in sport — Jack Casey, Alfred Archer · AI and Ethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS