Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Toward Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Among Community Pharmacists From the Pilgrimage City of South India: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Background and Aims: Integration of Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) reporting practices among community pharmacists (CPs) is essential to enhance the function of the Pharmacovigilance Program of India (PvPI) and promote medication safety. The study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) toward ADR reporting among CPs in Tirupati City. Methods: A cross-sectional analytical design was used to explore the KAP of the CPs regarding the ADR reporting system. CPs registered in the State Pharmacy Council, qualified with a diploma/bachelor's/master's in pharmacy/doctor of pharmacy, and willing to participate, regardless of pharmacy ownership, were included. An interview-based, structured, pre-validated questionnaire was used to obtain responses from the CPs. The questionnaire comprises demographic information and KAP regarding ADR reporting. The knowledge (good, moderate, and poor) and attitude (positive, neutral, and negative) domains were categorized based on Bloom's cut-off criteria. The practice domain was categorized as adequate or inadequate based on the median of the maximal score. Binary and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with CPs' KAP. Results: The majority of the CPs had a positive attitude (109; 78.42%) toward ADR reporting. However, they demonstrated moderate knowledge (56; 40.29%) and inadequate practices (126; 90.65%) about ADR reporting. More than 80% of the CPs were aware of the ADR identification and reporting process. Only 7.91% of the CPs have undergone ADR reporting training. There was a positive correlation between knowledge versus attitude, knowledge versus practice, and attitude versus practice of the CPs toward ADR reporting. Conclusion: Over three-fourths of community pharmacists showed a positive attitude toward ADR reporting, but attitude alone cannot drive practice without adequate knowledge. Strengthening knowledge is vital to translate attitude into practice. Hence, the ADR monitoring center, Tirupati, should organize periodic training to enhance ADR reporting and improve medication safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Science Reports
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.73122
Primary Topic
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Toward Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Among Community Pharmacists From the Pilgrimage City of South India: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Narayana Goruntla, Habibunnisa Syed, Durga Prasad Thammisetty, Bhavana Reddy Bommireddy et al.
Health Science Reports
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
article

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Toward Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Among Community Pharmacists From the Pilgrimage City of South India: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Narayana Goruntla, Habibunnisa Syed, Durga Prasad Thammisetty, Bhavana Reddy Bommireddy, Vaishnavi Pokuri -, Devika Minnekanti, Ganesh Mandem
article en

Abstract

Background and Aims: Integration of Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) reporting practices among community pharmacists (CPs) is essential to enhance the function of the Pharmacovigilance Program of India (PvPI) and promote medication safety. The study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) toward ADR reporting among CPs in Tirupati City. Methods: A cross-sectional analytical design was used to explore the KAP of the CPs regarding the ADR reporting system. CPs registered in the State Pharmacy Council, qualified with a diploma/bachelor's/master's in pharmacy/doctor of pharmacy, and willing to participate, regardless of pharmacy ownership, were included. An interview-based, structured, pre-validated questionnaire was used to obtain responses from the CPs. The questionnaire comprises demographic information and KAP regarding ADR reporting. The knowledge (good, moderate, and poor) and attitude (positive, neutral, and negative) domains were categorized based on Bloom's cut-off criteria. The practice domain was categorized as adequate or inadequate based on the median of the maximal score. Binary and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with CPs' KAP. Results: The majority of the CPs had a positive attitude (109; 78.42%) toward ADR reporting. However, they demonstrated moderate knowledge (56; 40.29%) and inadequate practices (126; 90.65%) about ADR reporting. More than 80% of the CPs were aware of the ADR identification and reporting process. Only 7.91% of the CPs have undergone ADR reporting training. There was a positive correlation between knowledge versus attitude, knowledge versus practice, and attitude versus practice of the CPs toward ADR reporting. Conclusion: Over three-fourths of community pharmacists showed a positive attitude toward ADR reporting, but attitude alone cannot drive practice without adequate knowledge. Strengthening knowledge is vital to translate attitude into practice. Hence, the ADR monitoring center, Tirupati, should organize periodic training to enhance ADR reporting and improve medication safety.

Health Science ReportsVol. 9(9)
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (US), Kampala International University (UG), Roland Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (IN), Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam (IN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.