Classifying Synkinesis Smile Dynamics: The UCL Classification System

OBJECTIVES: Patients with synkinesis struggle to emote through smiling, as their smiles tend to convey negative emotions rather than happiness. There is a wide variation in anatomic makeup and severity of smile asymmetry in patients with synkinesis. Despite this, a classification system does not exist to characterize these variations. This research presents a reliable, repeatable, and easy-to-use synkinesis smile classification system based on simple visual assessment: the "UCL System." METHODS: Two facial reanimation experts classified smile dynamics according to upper lip slope (U), paralyzed-side oral commissure angle (C), and lower lip symmetry (L). Automated facial expression software quantified emotions conveyed with smile and facial action units (AU) activated. Inter- and intrarater agreement were assessed via Fleiss' kappa value. RESULTS: About 366 patients were classified into 12 UCL groups. Activation of facial AU 12 (zygomaticus major), AU 14 (buccinator), and AU 25 (depressor labii inferioris) were significantly different between groups (p = 0.011, 0.050, and 0.017, respectively). There were significant differences in perceived happiness and negative emotions between groups (p = 0.018 and 0.034, respectively). There was moderate interrater agreement (Fleiss' kappa = 0.481, p < 0.001) and substantial intrarater agreement (Fleiss' kappa = 0.670, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The UCL synkinesis smile classification system is based on simple visual assessment and is reliable and repeatable. This system encourages clinicians to evaluate patients' smile dynamics and ultimately may help predict treatment outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Laryngoscope
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.70859
Primary Topic
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classifying Synkinesis Smile Dynamics: The UCL Classification System

Samuel P. O’Rourke, Zachary Elliott, Virginia E. Drake, Matthew Q. Miller
The Laryngoscope
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
article

Classifying Synkinesis Smile Dynamics: The UCL Classification System

Samuel P. O’Rourke, Zachary Elliott, Virginia E. Drake, Matthew Q. Miller
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patients with synkinesis struggle to emote through smiling, as their smiles tend to convey negative emotions rather than happiness. There is a wide variation in anatomic makeup and severity of smile asymmetry in patients with synkinesis. Despite this, a classification system does not exist to characterize these variations. This research presents a reliable, repeatable, and easy-to-use synkinesis smile classification system based on simple visual assessment: the "UCL System." METHODS: Two facial reanimation experts classified smile dynamics according to upper lip slope (U), paralyzed-side oral commissure angle (C), and lower lip symmetry (L). Automated facial expression software quantified emotions conveyed with smile and facial action units (AU) activated. Inter- and intrarater agreement were assessed via Fleiss' kappa value. RESULTS: About 366 patients were classified into 12 UCL groups. Activation of facial AU 12 (zygomaticus major), AU 14 (buccinator), and AU 25 (depressor labii inferioris) were significantly different between groups (p = 0.011, 0.050, and 0.017, respectively). There were significant differences in perceived happiness and negative emotions between groups (p = 0.018 and 0.034, respectively). There was moderate interrater agreement (Fleiss' kappa = 0.481, p < 0.001) and substantial intrarater agreement (Fleiss' kappa = 0.670, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The UCL synkinesis smile classification system is based on simple visual assessment and is reliable and repeatable. This system encourages clinicians to evaluate patients' smile dynamics and ultimately may help predict treatment outcomes.

The Laryngoscope
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.