Surgical outcomes of ipsilateral in-situ versus contralateral or free internal thoracic artery grafting in dialysis-dependent patients with upper-extremity arteriovenous fistulas undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE: The use of in-situ internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts ipsilateral to upper extremity arteriovenous fistulas (UE-AVFs) during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in dialysis-dependent patients raises concerns of coronary steal and compromised graft perfusion. However, the clinical significance of ITA-AVF laterality remains uncertain. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed dialysis-dependent patients who underwent CABG between February 2015 and December 2023 at two institutions. Patients with non-UE-AVF access, total vein grafting, or composite vein-artery configurations were excluded. The final cohort (N = 122) was divided into two groups: ipsilateral in-situ ITA grafts (N = 66) and contralateral in-situ or free ITA grafts (N = 56). Primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE); secondary outcomes included perioperative complications, hemodialysis-induced ischemia, and 3-year survival. RESULTS: Baseline and operative characteristics were largely comparable between groups. Perioperative outcomes, including surgical site infection, 30-day mortality, and prolonged ventilation, showed no significant differences. Over a median follow-up of 2.4 years, MACCE occurred in 44% of patients (39% ipsilateral vs. 50% contralateral/free ITA; p = 0.24), with no significant differences in 3-year mortality (29% vs. 21%; p = 0.352). Multivariable analyses showed no association between ITA-AVF laterality and MACCE (aOR 0.68, p = 0.31) or 3-year mortality (aHR 1.56, p = 0.291). CONCLUSIONS: In this modestly sized retrospective cohort, ipsilateral in-situ ITA grafting was not associated with significantly worse perioperative or long-term outcomes. Our findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating, and larger multicenter studies are needed to more definitively evaluate the safety of this grafting strategy in dialysis-dependent patients with UE-AVFs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivag231
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Surgical outcomes of ipsilateral in-situ versus contralateral or free internal thoracic artery grafting in dialysis-dependent patients with upper-extremity arteriovenous fistulas undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Arian Mansur, George Tolis, Jordan Bloom, Patrick Udeh et al.
Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Surgical outcomes of ipsilateral in-situ versus contralateral or free internal thoracic artery grafting in dialysis-dependent patients with upper-extremity arteriovenous fistulas undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Arian Mansur, George Tolis, Jordan Bloom, Patrick Udeh, Chijioke Chukwudi, Asishana A Osho, David A D’Alessandro, Benjamin Grobman, Ruby Singh, Thoralf M Sundt
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The use of in-situ internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts ipsilateral to upper extremity arteriovenous fistulas (UE-AVFs) during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in dialysis-dependent patients raises concerns of coronary steal and compromised graft perfusion. However, the clinical significance of ITA-AVF laterality remains uncertain. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed dialysis-dependent patients who underwent CABG between February 2015 and December 2023 at two institutions. Patients with non-UE-AVF access, total vein grafting, or composite vein-artery configurations were excluded. The final cohort (N = 122) was divided into two groups: ipsilateral in-situ ITA grafts (N = 66) and contralateral in-situ or free ITA grafts (N = 56). Primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE); secondary outcomes included perioperative complications, hemodialysis-induced ischemia, and 3-year survival. RESULTS: Baseline and operative characteristics were largely comparable between groups. Perioperative outcomes, including surgical site infection, 30-day mortality, and prolonged ventilation, showed no significant differences. Over a median follow-up of 2.4 years, MACCE occurred in 44% of patients (39% ipsilateral vs. 50% contralateral/free ITA; p = 0.24), with no significant differences in 3-year mortality (29% vs. 21%; p = 0.352). Multivariable analyses showed no association between ITA-AVF laterality and MACCE (aOR 0.68, p = 0.31) or 3-year mortality (aHR 1.56, p = 0.291). CONCLUSIONS: In this modestly sized retrospective cohort, ipsilateral in-situ ITA grafting was not associated with significantly worse perioperative or long-term outcomes. Our findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating, and larger multicenter studies are needed to more definitively evaluate the safety of this grafting strategy in dialysis-dependent patients with UE-AVFs.

Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery
Harvard University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Stanford Medicine (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.