Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Liver Resection: A Prospective Single-Center Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Predictors of Recovery

Background: Traditional outcome assessment after liver surgery mainly relies on perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, these parameters fail to capture the multidimensional recovery experienced by patients after hepatic resection. This study aimed to evaluate changes in quality of life (QoL) between the preoperative and three-month postoperative assessments using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and to identify factors associated with impaired postoperative recovery. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted including 71 consecutive patients undergoing liver resection at a tertiary hepatobiliary referral center between May 2024 and May 2025. QoL was assessed preoperatively and three months after surgery using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LMC21 questionnaires. PROMs were correlated with demographic, clinical, operative, and postoperative variables. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with worse postoperative QoL. Results: Significant improvements in postoperative QoL were observed at three months compared with baseline in both the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LMC21 questionnaires (both p < 0.001). Psychological domains also significantly improved after surgery. Patients with ASA scores ≥ 3 (p = 0.044) and those requiring intraoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.011) reported significantly worse postoperative quality-of-life scores. On multivariable regression analysis, Grade B bile leak was associated with impaired postoperative QLQ-C30 outcomes (95% CI 0.75–23.81; p = 0.038). Conclusions: Liver resection was associated with improvement in patient-reported QoL three months after surgery. PROMs provide clinically relevant information beyond conventional surgical metrics and may help identify patients requiring tailored perioperative support. The integration of PROMs into liver surgery pathways may contribute to the development of a more patient-centered model of surgical care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18172767
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Liver Resection: A Prospective Single-Center Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Predictors of Recovery

Matteo Colangelo, Paolo Baroffio, Marcello Di Martino, Matteo Donadon et al.
Cancers
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Liver Resection: A Prospective Single-Center Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Predictors of Recovery

Matteo Colangelo, Paolo Baroffio, Marcello Di Martino, Matteo Donadon, Teresa Gatto
article en

Abstract

Background: Traditional outcome assessment after liver surgery mainly relies on perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, these parameters fail to capture the multidimensional recovery experienced by patients after hepatic resection. This study aimed to evaluate changes in quality of life (QoL) between the preoperative and three-month postoperative assessments using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and to identify factors associated with impaired postoperative recovery. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted including 71 consecutive patients undergoing liver resection at a tertiary hepatobiliary referral center between May 2024 and May 2025. QoL was assessed preoperatively and three months after surgery using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LMC21 questionnaires. PROMs were correlated with demographic, clinical, operative, and postoperative variables. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with worse postoperative QoL. Results: Significant improvements in postoperative QoL were observed at three months compared with baseline in both the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LMC21 questionnaires (both p < 0.001). Psychological domains also significantly improved after surgery. Patients with ASA scores ≥ 3 (p = 0.044) and those requiring intraoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.011) reported significantly worse postoperative quality-of-life scores. On multivariable regression analysis, Grade B bile leak was associated with impaired postoperative QLQ-C30 outcomes (95% CI 0.75–23.81; p = 0.038). Conclusions: Liver resection was associated with improvement in patient-reported QoL three months after surgery. PROMs provide clinically relevant information beyond conventional surgical metrics and may help identify patients requiring tailored perioperative support. The integration of PROMs into liver surgery pathways may contribute to the development of a more patient-centered model of surgical care.

CancersVol. 18(17)
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Maggiore (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.