When faith meets enterprise: coordinating meanings for coping with stress among Buddhist entrepreneurs in China

Entrepreneurs often face persistent, uncontrollable stressors, yet research has prioritised problem- and emotion-focused coping over meaning-making processes. Drawing on Park and Folkman’s global-situational framework, this qualitative study examines how religious (Buddhist) and professional (entrepreneurial) meanings interact in coping among Chinese Buddhist entrepreneurs. Based on semi-structured interviews with 22 interviewees, we identify two families of interaction mechanisms: overriding (prioritising Buddhist meanings when entrepreneurial frames fail, e.g. interpreting outcomes through karma or elevating religious goals over profit) and intertwined (integrating meanings, e.g. pairing non-attachment with perseverance to sustain effort while reducing outcome fixation). These mechanisms generate situational meanings that render adversity bearable without abandoning entrepreneurial commitments. The study advances meaning-making coping by showing that it involves coordinating multiple components within global meaning, not merely reconstructing situational appraisals. We reconceptualise global meaning as a dynamic, negotiable system where stability and flexibility coexist, illustrating how religious resources support rather than substitute for entrepreneurial logics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small Enterprise Research
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13215906.2026.2718706
Primary Topic
Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When faith meets enterprise: coordinating meanings for coping with stress among Buddhist entrepreneurs in China

Christian Yao, Yang Yu, Zheng (Daniel) Duan
Small Enterprise Research
Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
article

When faith meets enterprise: coordinating meanings for coping with stress among Buddhist entrepreneurs in China

Christian Yao, Yang Yu, Zheng (Daniel) Duan
article en

Abstract

Entrepreneurs often face persistent, uncontrollable stressors, yet research has prioritised problem- and emotion-focused coping over meaning-making processes. Drawing on Park and Folkman’s global-situational framework, this qualitative study examines how religious (Buddhist) and professional (entrepreneurial) meanings interact in coping among Chinese Buddhist entrepreneurs. Based on semi-structured interviews with 22 interviewees, we identify two families of interaction mechanisms: overriding (prioritising Buddhist meanings when entrepreneurial frames fail, e.g. interpreting outcomes through karma or elevating religious goals over profit) and intertwined (integrating meanings, e.g. pairing non-attachment with perseverance to sustain effort while reducing outcome fixation). These mechanisms generate situational meanings that render adversity bearable without abandoning entrepreneurial commitments. The study advances meaning-making coping by showing that it involves coordinating multiple components within global meaning, not merely reconstructing situational appraisals. We reconceptualise global meaning as a dynamic, negotiable system where stability and flexibility coexist, illustrating how religious resources support rather than substitute for entrepreneurial logics.

Small Enterprise Research
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), Massey University (NZ), RMIT University (AU)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.