Assessing Strong Sustainability and Systemic Leadership in Corporate Climate Action: A Case Study From the Copper Mining Industry

ABSTRACT This paper proposes an exploratory instrument to assess how well organizations embed strong sustainability and systemic leadership into their climate mitigation efforts. After reviewing the case for strong sustainability in corporate climate action, it outlines a method, based on organizational psychologist Rae André's systemic climate leadership framework, to gauge how well companies (1) demonstrate basic climate literacy and risk awareness, (2) engage as agents of systemic change in their dealing with key external stakeholders, and (3) embrace a strong sustainability approach to decarbonization that prioritizes ecological science over economic expediency. The instrument is then tested via a case study of Freeport‐McMoRan, the world's largest publicly traded copper mining company. Freeport's approach to decarbonization was ascertained using document analysis of its website, corporate policies, sustainability reports, executive letters to stakeholders, interviews, and CDP questionnaires. Ultimately, although Freeport‐McMoRan's executive leadership has moderately demonstrated climate literacy, acknowledged climate risks, and selectively operated as an agent of systemic change through sectoral associations and with suppliers, it has not embraced strong sustainability to power its decarbonization efforts nor to advocate for climate policies. Applying the instrument produces a roadmap for researchers and executives looking to advance absolute decarbonization in large companies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70931
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Strong Sustainability and Systemic Leadership in Corporate Climate Action: A Case Study From the Copper Mining Industry

Aaron Danowski
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Mining and Resource Management
article

Assessing Strong Sustainability and Systemic Leadership in Corporate Climate Action: A Case Study From the Copper Mining Industry

Aaron Danowski
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper proposes an exploratory instrument to assess how well organizations embed strong sustainability and systemic leadership into their climate mitigation efforts. After reviewing the case for strong sustainability in corporate climate action, it outlines a method, based on organizational psychologist Rae André's systemic climate leadership framework, to gauge how well companies (1) demonstrate basic climate literacy and risk awareness, (2) engage as agents of systemic change in their dealing with key external stakeholders, and (3) embrace a strong sustainability approach to decarbonization that prioritizes ecological science over economic expediency. The instrument is then tested via a case study of Freeport‐McMoRan, the world's largest publicly traded copper mining company. Freeport's approach to decarbonization was ascertained using document analysis of its website, corporate policies, sustainability reports, executive letters to stakeholders, interviews, and CDP questionnaires. Ultimately, although Freeport‐McMoRan's executive leadership has moderately demonstrated climate literacy, acknowledged climate risks, and selectively operated as an agent of systemic change through sectoral associations and with suppliers, it has not embraced strong sustainability to power its decarbonization efforts nor to advocate for climate policies. Applying the instrument produces a roadmap for researchers and executives looking to advance absolute decarbonization in large companies.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Gonzaga University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Mining and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.