REST Versus SOAP in Modern Enterprise Systems: A Structured Literature Review

The evolution of modern enterprise architecture has been strongly influenced by distributed web services, especially protocol-based standards such as Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) and resource-oriented architectural styles such as Representational State Transfer (REST). Cloud-native ecosystems, microservice architectures, and public API management commonly favor the lightweight, JSON-compatible, and horizontally scalable characteristics of RESTful services, whereas legacy configurations and highly regulated environments continue to use SOAP because of its formal contracts and compatibility with WS-* specifications for message-level security, reliable messaging, and transaction coordination. This paper presents a structured literature review that evaluates the architectural trade-offs, performance patterns, security boundaries, reliability considerations, and enterprise use cases of REST and SOAP. The review follows PRISMA-informed reporting practices and software-engineering review guidance, but it is not presented as an exhaustive systematic review because the original search strategy required REST and SOAP terms to appear together. IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, ScienceDirect, and Scopus were searched for studies published between 2021 and 2026, resulting in 32 selected studies. The selected literature contains different evidence roles, including direct REST-SOAP empirical comparisons, REST-only and SOAP-only empirical studies, implementation studies, analytical papers, surveys, reviews, and contextual technical sources. The synthesis therefore separates direct empirical evidence from contextual and secondary evidence. The findings indicate that RESTful APIs generally show lower latency, smaller payloads, simpler parsing, and better horizontal scalability in the reported benchmark and web-facing settings, while SOAP remains relevant where formal service contracts, message-level protection, reliable messaging patterns, and transaction coordination are required. The paper identifies gaps in production-representative stress testing, empirical security comparison, reference-level traceability, and independent validation of hybrid REST-SOAP decision models. The resulting decision framework is presented as a provisional evidence-informed decision aid, not as an empirically validated tool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Internet
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fi18090454
Primary Topic
Software System Performance and Reliability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

REST Versus SOAP in Modern Enterprise Systems: A Structured Literature Review

R Kanesaraj Ramasamy, Mohd Fareez Said Rahman, Puganeswaran Kannan, Chong Wei Yen
Future Internet
Software System Performance and Reliability
article

REST Versus SOAP in Modern Enterprise Systems: A Structured Literature Review

R Kanesaraj Ramasamy, Mohd Fareez Said Rahman, Puganeswaran Kannan, Chong Wei Yen
article en

Abstract

The evolution of modern enterprise architecture has been strongly influenced by distributed web services, especially protocol-based standards such as Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) and resource-oriented architectural styles such as Representational State Transfer (REST). Cloud-native ecosystems, microservice architectures, and public API management commonly favor the lightweight, JSON-compatible, and horizontally scalable characteristics of RESTful services, whereas legacy configurations and highly regulated environments continue to use SOAP because of its formal contracts and compatibility with WS-* specifications for message-level security, reliable messaging, and transaction coordination. This paper presents a structured literature review that evaluates the architectural trade-offs, performance patterns, security boundaries, reliability considerations, and enterprise use cases of REST and SOAP. The review follows PRISMA-informed reporting practices and software-engineering review guidance, but it is not presented as an exhaustive systematic review because the original search strategy required REST and SOAP terms to appear together. IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, ScienceDirect, and Scopus were searched for studies published between 2021 and 2026, resulting in 32 selected studies. The selected literature contains different evidence roles, including direct REST-SOAP empirical comparisons, REST-only and SOAP-only empirical studies, implementation studies, analytical papers, surveys, reviews, and contextual technical sources. The synthesis therefore separates direct empirical evidence from contextual and secondary evidence. The findings indicate that RESTful APIs generally show lower latency, smaller payloads, simpler parsing, and better horizontal scalability in the reported benchmark and web-facing settings, while SOAP remains relevant where formal service contracts, message-level protection, reliable messaging patterns, and transaction coordination are required. The paper identifies gaps in production-representative stress testing, empirical security comparison, reference-level traceability, and independent validation of hybrid REST-SOAP decision models. The resulting decision framework is presented as a provisional evidence-informed decision aid, not as an empirically validated tool.

Future InternetVol. 18(9)
Multimedia University (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Software System Performance and Reliability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.