Linguistically Informed Automated Estimates of Creak in Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia

Purpose: Creaky voice is a perceptually low-pitched and irregular voice quality that has shown promise as an objective marker of adductor laryngeal dystonia (AdLD). However, creak also occurs in mainstream American English through linguistic processes (i.e., phrase-final creak, /t/ glottalization, word-initial vowel glottalization). This study investigated whether linguistically unexpected creak (i.e., creak occurring outside these phonological contexts) offers improved differentiation between AdLD and typical voices compared with total creak. Method: Fifty speakers with AdLD and 50 age- and sex-matched controls read the first paragraph of The Rainbow Passage . A priori locations for linguistically expected creak were identified based on established phonological processes. An automated algorithm detected the percentage of creak (%creak) within voiced segments. A linear mixed-effects model examined the interaction between group (AdLD, control) and creak type (expected vs. unexpected). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses compared the diagnostic accuracy of unexpected %creak and total %creak. Results: Both groups produced more expected than unexpected creak, but a significant interaction revealed that this difference was statistically weaker in the AdLD group. Between-groups differences were significantly larger for unexpected creak than for expected creak. Unexpected creak demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve = .82 vs. .77, p < .001), with an optimal cutoff of 4.0% at a sensitivity of .78 and a specificity of .84. Conclusions: Pathological creak in AdLD disrupts normal linguistic patterning, spreading disproportionately into unexpected contexts. Linguistically unexpected creak provides superior diagnostic discrimination compared with total creak, suggesting that acoustic biomarkers accounting for linguistic context can meaningfully enhance diagnostic accuracy for AdLD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_jslhr-25-00997
Primary Topic
Voice and Speech Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linguistically Informed Automated Estimates of Creak in Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia

Laura E. Toles, Cara Sauder, Brittany Fletcher, Katherine L. Marks et al.
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Voice and Speech Disorders
article

Linguistically Informed Automated Estimates of Creak in Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia

Laura E. Toles, Cara Sauder, Brittany Fletcher, Katherine L. Marks, Maxine Van Doren, Tanya L. Eadie, Mara R. Kapsner-Smith, Cara E. Stepp, Jenny Vojtech
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Creaky voice is a perceptually low-pitched and irregular voice quality that has shown promise as an objective marker of adductor laryngeal dystonia (AdLD). However, creak also occurs in mainstream American English through linguistic processes (i.e., phrase-final creak, /t/ glottalization, word-initial vowel glottalization). This study investigated whether linguistically unexpected creak (i.e., creak occurring outside these phonological contexts) offers improved differentiation between AdLD and typical voices compared with total creak. Method: Fifty speakers with AdLD and 50 age- and sex-matched controls read the first paragraph of The Rainbow Passage . A priori locations for linguistically expected creak were identified based on established phonological processes. An automated algorithm detected the percentage of creak (%creak) within voiced segments. A linear mixed-effects model examined the interaction between group (AdLD, control) and creak type (expected vs. unexpected). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses compared the diagnostic accuracy of unexpected %creak and total %creak. Results: Both groups produced more expected than unexpected creak, but a significant interaction revealed that this difference was statistically weaker in the AdLD group. Between-groups differences were significantly larger for unexpected creak than for expected creak. Unexpected creak demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve = .82 vs. .77, p < .001), with an optimal cutoff of 4.0% at a sensitivity of .78 and a specificity of .84. Conclusions: Pathological creak in AdLD disrupts normal linguistic patterning, spreading disproportionately into unexpected contexts. Linguistically unexpected creak provides superior diagnostic discrimination compared with total creak, suggesting that acoustic biomarkers accounting for linguistic context can meaningfully enhance diagnostic accuracy for AdLD.

Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
University of Central Florida (US), Boston University (US), Emory University (US), University of Washington (US), University of Washington Medical Center (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), California State University, San Bernardino (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Voice and Speech Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.