Rhode Island Affordability Standards and Hospital-Affiliated Clinicians’ Professional Fees

Importance: In response to growing concerns about increasing hospital prices, Rhode Island placed caps on facility fee growth in 2010 through its Affordability Standards. Research found that the price growth caps successfully reduced hospital facility fees relative to other states. However, hospitals' response to revenue loss from the Affordability Standards-including seeking to acquire more clinicians and increasing nonregulated professional fees for affiliated clinicians-is unknown. Objective: To compare changes in vertical integration and changes in professional fees for evaluation and management services for clinicians affiliated with Rhode Island hospitals with such changes for clinicians affiliated with hospitals in other New England states. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2019, commercial claims data from the Health Care Cost Institute data contributors and data on vertically integrated clinicians. The analytic sample included 5 364 983 evaluation and management services performed by 10 352 hospital-affiliated clinicians in Rhode Island and other New England states. Analyses were performed from April 2024 through December 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: Study outcomes included the share of vertically integrated clinicians and professional fees per evaluation and management encounter. Results: The study included 2 292 504 commercial enrollees (Rhode Island vs other New England states: female, 64.8% vs 59.6%; and age ≥65 years, 6.8% vs 6.4%). In 2013, vertically integrated clinicians accounted for a smaller share in Rhode Island vs other New England states (32.0% vs 46.4%), as did mean (SD) professional fees per evaluation and management encounter ($105.8 [$37.9] vs $141.7 [$61.8]). Vertical integration increased more slowly in Rhode Island compared with neighboring states (-0.4 percentage points [95% CI, -0.7 to -0.1 percentage points]) and the annual change in professional fees for hospital-affiliated clinicians in Rhode Island was $1.55 (95% CI, -$2.02 to -$1.08) lower per service than for those in other New England states. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study of vertical integration and professional fees in Rhode Island compared with surrounding New England states found that Rhode Island hospitals did not circumvent the Affordability Standards through increased vertical integration activity or professional fees among integrated clinicians. This research suggests that hospital facility fee regulations may limit hospital bargaining leverage and market power along with price increases more broadly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.30849
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Rhode Island Affordability Standards and Hospital-Affiliated Clinicians’ Professional Fees

Christopher Whaley, Roslyn C. Murray, Andrew M. Ryan
JAMA Network Open
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Rhode Island Affordability Standards and Hospital-Affiliated Clinicians’ Professional Fees

Christopher Whaley, Roslyn C. Murray, Andrew M. Ryan
article en

Abstract

Importance: In response to growing concerns about increasing hospital prices, Rhode Island placed caps on facility fee growth in 2010 through its Affordability Standards. Research found that the price growth caps successfully reduced hospital facility fees relative to other states. However, hospitals' response to revenue loss from the Affordability Standards-including seeking to acquire more clinicians and increasing nonregulated professional fees for affiliated clinicians-is unknown. Objective: To compare changes in vertical integration and changes in professional fees for evaluation and management services for clinicians affiliated with Rhode Island hospitals with such changes for clinicians affiliated with hospitals in other New England states. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2019, commercial claims data from the Health Care Cost Institute data contributors and data on vertically integrated clinicians. The analytic sample included 5 364 983 evaluation and management services performed by 10 352 hospital-affiliated clinicians in Rhode Island and other New England states. Analyses were performed from April 2024 through December 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: Study outcomes included the share of vertically integrated clinicians and professional fees per evaluation and management encounter. Results: The study included 2 292 504 commercial enrollees (Rhode Island vs other New England states: female, 64.8% vs 59.6%; and age ≥65 years, 6.8% vs 6.4%). In 2013, vertically integrated clinicians accounted for a smaller share in Rhode Island vs other New England states (32.0% vs 46.4%), as did mean (SD) professional fees per evaluation and management encounter ($105.8 [$37.9] vs $141.7 [$61.8]). Vertical integration increased more slowly in Rhode Island compared with neighboring states (-0.4 percentage points [95% CI, -0.7 to -0.1 percentage points]) and the annual change in professional fees for hospital-affiliated clinicians in Rhode Island was $1.55 (95% CI, -$2.02 to -$1.08) lower per service than for those in other New England states. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study of vertical integration and professional fees in Rhode Island compared with surrounding New England states found that Rhode Island hospitals did not circumvent the Affordability Standards through increased vertical integration activity or professional fees among integrated clinicians. This research suggests that hospital facility fee regulations may limit hospital bargaining leverage and market power along with price increases more broadly.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(8)
Brown University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.