Deceptive Overgeneralization: When Adaptive Learning Enables Systematic Misapplication

ABSTRACT Background Adaptive learning systems infer mastery from observed correctness, but this approach may fall short when learners exhibit ‘deceptive overgeneralization’—performing correct actions based on incomplete understanding. This phenomenon can mislead systems into prematurely stopping practice, leaving knowledge gaps unaddressed. Clarifying when deceptive overgeneralization occurs and how to address it can improve the precision of adaptive learning technologies. Objectives This research empirically examines whether deceptive overgeneralization occurs in adaptive learning, assesses its consequences for mastery‐based stopping rules, and evaluates a systematic procedure for detecting and remedying it. Methods We conducted 11 experiments using Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) for Riichi Mahjong across multiple semesters with university students (total N = 192). The studies employed a pretest–posttest design to assess ITS effectiveness, and within‐subjects designs with adaptive and full‐exposure conditions to examine overgeneralization and remediation. Tailored remediation consisted of targeted ‘do‐not‐act’ problems with feedback that names the missing application constraints. Results and Conclusions ITSs improved learning outcomes, but learners frequently misapplied acquired actions in contexts where they should have refrained, indicating deceptive overgeneralization. Under adaptive learning, mastery stopping rules often ended practice before learners encountered such ‘do‐not‐act’ contexts, leaving the issue undetected. Tailored remediation using targeted ‘do‐not‐act’ problems with constraint‐naming feedback reduced misapplication to near‐floor levels across skills and cohorts, highlighting a limitation of correctness‐based mastery inference and a practical method to strengthen mastery assessment for knowledge compilation. A secondary analysis of K–12 decimal learning data further illustrates how the framework applies in a traditional educational domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcal.70311
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deceptive Overgeneralization: When Adaptive Learning Enables Systematic Misapplication

Bruce M. McLaren, John Stamper, Marshall An
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
article

Deceptive Overgeneralization: When Adaptive Learning Enables Systematic Misapplication

Bruce M. McLaren, John Stamper, Marshall An
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Adaptive learning systems infer mastery from observed correctness, but this approach may fall short when learners exhibit ‘deceptive overgeneralization’—performing correct actions based on incomplete understanding. This phenomenon can mislead systems into prematurely stopping practice, leaving knowledge gaps unaddressed. Clarifying when deceptive overgeneralization occurs and how to address it can improve the precision of adaptive learning technologies. Objectives This research empirically examines whether deceptive overgeneralization occurs in adaptive learning, assesses its consequences for mastery‐based stopping rules, and evaluates a systematic procedure for detecting and remedying it. Methods We conducted 11 experiments using Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) for Riichi Mahjong across multiple semesters with university students (total N = 192). The studies employed a pretest–posttest design to assess ITS effectiveness, and within‐subjects designs with adaptive and full‐exposure conditions to examine overgeneralization and remediation. Tailored remediation consisted of targeted ‘do‐not‐act’ problems with feedback that names the missing application constraints. Results and Conclusions ITSs improved learning outcomes, but learners frequently misapplied acquired actions in contexts where they should have refrained, indicating deceptive overgeneralization. Under adaptive learning, mastery stopping rules often ended practice before learners encountered such ‘do‐not‐act’ contexts, leaving the issue undetected. Tailored remediation using targeted ‘do‐not‐act’ problems with constraint‐naming feedback reduced misapplication to near‐floor levels across skills and cohorts, highlighting a limitation of correctness‐based mastery inference and a practical method to strengthen mastery assessment for knowledge compilation. A secondary analysis of K–12 decimal learning data further illustrates how the framework applies in a traditional educational domain.

Journal of Computer Assisted LearningVol. 42(5)
Human Computer Interaction (Switzerland) (CH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.