Building Methodological Skill and Confidence Through CUREs in Political Science

Undergraduate research methods courses often invoke fear and anxiety in many political science students and this trepidation can inhibit learning. However, the importance of understanding and applying various research methodologies to answer important empirical questions is central to promoting the transfer and construction of disciplinary knowledge. Political science undergraduates in the U.S. often get few opportunities to utilize methodological skills through traditional undergraduate research experiences as compared to their peers in the natural sciences where students are often paired with faculty mentors in lab-based research settings. To overcome these hurdles, I experimented with adapting course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) – a teaching strategy commonly employed in natural science disciplines – as a means of strengthening and applying research methodology in the political science curriculum. CUREs activities were integrated into an advanced undergraduate course on the U.S. Supreme Court to allow students to build, reinforce, and practice research skills while gaining content-specific knowledge about the Court. Pre-post surveys of students showed that the CUREs-based experiences increased both perceived methodological skill and comfort levels. These findings support the conclusion that embedding CUREs-based course content in advanced undergraduate political science courses can be an effective way of improving student success with the social science research process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Science Education
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2026.2722081
Primary Topic
Political Science Research and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building Methodological Skill and Confidence Through CUREs in Political Science

Jenna Becker Kane
Journal of Political Science Education
Political Science Research and Education
article

Building Methodological Skill and Confidence Through CUREs in Political Science

Jenna Becker Kane
article en

Abstract

Undergraduate research methods courses often invoke fear and anxiety in many political science students and this trepidation can inhibit learning. However, the importance of understanding and applying various research methodologies to answer important empirical questions is central to promoting the transfer and construction of disciplinary knowledge. Political science undergraduates in the U.S. often get few opportunities to utilize methodological skills through traditional undergraduate research experiences as compared to their peers in the natural sciences where students are often paired with faculty mentors in lab-based research settings. To overcome these hurdles, I experimented with adapting course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) – a teaching strategy commonly employed in natural science disciplines – as a means of strengthening and applying research methodology in the political science curriculum. CUREs activities were integrated into an advanced undergraduate course on the U.S. Supreme Court to allow students to build, reinforce, and practice research skills while gaining content-specific knowledge about the Court. Pre-post surveys of students showed that the CUREs-based experiences increased both perceived methodological skill and comfort levels. These findings support the conclusion that embedding CUREs-based course content in advanced undergraduate political science courses can be an effective way of improving student success with the social science research process.

Journal of Political Science Education
West Chester University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Political Science Research and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.