CAD-RADS 2.0-guided diagnostic pathways in chronic coronary syndromes: a real-world Polish registry of over 10 000 patients

BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) reported with Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) 2.0 is increasingly used in chronic coronary syndromes, but real-world adherence to the recommended downstream pathways is poorly characterized. AIMS: To describe the population referred for CCTA in a Polish tertiary center, the distribution of CAD-RADS 2.0 categories by sex and age, and adherence to guideline-recommended downstream pathways. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 10 005 consecutive patients who underwent CCTA between July 1, 2022 and December 31, 2024. Downstream procedures were identified in the National Health Fund registry. A pre-specified multivariable logistic regression model (CAD-RADS category, age, sex) described referral for invasive coronary angiography (ICA); discrimination was quantified as the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Women constituted 57.8% of the cohort and were older than men (mean 66.4 vs. 64.1 years; P < 0.001). The distribution of categories differed by sex (P < 0.001). Among patients with CAD-RADS 0-2, 18.5% underwent at least one additional test. Among patients with CAD-RADS 3, 41.8% proceeded directly to ICA without prior functional testing and 17.7% followed a functional-testing-first pathway. Among patients with CAD-RADS 4-5, 26.0% did not undergo ICA and 17.8% had no further testing. CAD-RADS category dominated referral for ICA (full model AUC 0.886; 95% confidence interval, 0.877-0.894; CAD-RADS alone 0.883; age and sex alone 0.677). CONCLUSIONS: Divergence between observed and guideline-recommended pathways was evident across all CAD-RADS categories, indicating a need for structured implementation of CAD-RADS-guided care pathways.