Influence of Caregiver Input and Dyadic Arrangement on Naturalistic Communication Sampling for Children With Neurogenetic Syndromes

PURPOSE: Natural communication samples are a useful tool for measuring social communication and language remotely via telehealth, particularly for children with low-incidence neurogenetic syndromes (NGS). The purpose of this study is to examine how dyadic factors (caregiver language input, dyadic positioning, and dyadic proximity) impact measures of social communication derived from remotely collected caregiver-child communication samples in children with and without NGS. METHOD: Participants included 72 young children and their caregivers (16 Angelman syndrome, 24 Down syndrome, 13 fragile X syndrome, and 19 low-likelihood controls). Participants completed a 10-min video-recorded play interaction with their caregiver in their home, and all video recordings were coded for social communication using the Communication Complexity Scale (CCS), dyadic positioning, and dyadic proximity. Caregiver language input was derived from Language Environment Analysis recordings of the 10-min play interaction. Moderated multiple regression analyses were used to determine whether dyadic interaction variables (positioning, proximity, and caregiver input) predicted CCS scores and whether these effects varied by NGS status. RESULTS: More caregiver language input was associated with higher CCS scores in non-NGS dyads but not in NGS dyads, though there was no relationship between language input and CCS scores when controlling for developmental age. Dyadic positioning and proximity were not associated with CCS scores across the sample, though higher CCS scores were associated with more time spent at right angles or facing the caregiver in children who demonstrated primarily pre-intentional social communication skills. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that measurement of social communication using the CCS via remotely collected natural communication samples is robust to variability in dyadic factors. Developmental age should be considered when interpreting measures from remote communication samples, and procedures for optimal positioning should be considered for children with primarily pre-intentional social communication skills. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.33209097.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_jslhr-25-00892
Primary Topic
Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Caregiver Input and Dyadic Arrangement on Naturalistic Communication Sampling for Children With Neurogenetic Syndromes

Bridgette Kelleher, Katiana A. Estrada, Olivia Boorom, Nancy C. Brady et al.
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
article

Influence of Caregiver Input and Dyadic Arrangement on Naturalistic Communication Sampling for Children With Neurogenetic Syndromes

Bridgette Kelleher, Katiana A. Estrada, Olivia Boorom, Nancy C. Brady, Lisa R. Hamrick, Amanda Seidl
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Natural communication samples are a useful tool for measuring social communication and language remotely via telehealth, particularly for children with low-incidence neurogenetic syndromes (NGS). The purpose of this study is to examine how dyadic factors (caregiver language input, dyadic positioning, and dyadic proximity) impact measures of social communication derived from remotely collected caregiver-child communication samples in children with and without NGS. METHOD: Participants included 72 young children and their caregivers (16 Angelman syndrome, 24 Down syndrome, 13 fragile X syndrome, and 19 low-likelihood controls). Participants completed a 10-min video-recorded play interaction with their caregiver in their home, and all video recordings were coded for social communication using the Communication Complexity Scale (CCS), dyadic positioning, and dyadic proximity. Caregiver language input was derived from Language Environment Analysis recordings of the 10-min play interaction. Moderated multiple regression analyses were used to determine whether dyadic interaction variables (positioning, proximity, and caregiver input) predicted CCS scores and whether these effects varied by NGS status. RESULTS: More caregiver language input was associated with higher CCS scores in non-NGS dyads but not in NGS dyads, though there was no relationship between language input and CCS scores when controlling for developmental age. Dyadic positioning and proximity were not associated with CCS scores across the sample, though higher CCS scores were associated with more time spent at right angles or facing the caregiver in children who demonstrated primarily pre-intentional social communication skills. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that measurement of social communication using the CCS via remotely collected natural communication samples is robust to variability in dyadic factors. Developmental age should be considered when interpreting measures from remote communication samples, and procedures for optimal positioning should be considered for children with primarily pre-intentional social communication skills. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.33209097.

Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
University of Kansas (US), University of South Carolina (US), Georgia State University (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), University of Delaware (US)
National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.