Bringing Single-Case Experimental Designs Into Routine Care

Abstract: Theoretical Background: Single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) are well-suited for evaluating clinical interventions in routine care and enable causal inference at the individual level through repeated measurement and systematic manipulation. Objectives: This study introduces a standardized SCED infrastructure based on the software m-Path integrated into a university outpatient clinic to enhance accessibility and usability. The SCED infrastructure is used for repeated measures in everyday life in routine clinical care and can also be easily applied to conduct SCED studies in research projects. Method: The protocol for routine clinical care involves repeated 2-week assessment periods (one per day) across waiting, diagnostic, therapy, post-therapy, and follow-up phases. Emotion regulation is assessed as a transdiagnostic process alongside idiographic problem and goal items. Patients access their data via a mobile app, while therapists use automated web-based visualizations for feedback discussions. User training includes patient onboarding and therapist workshops. Results: Feedback from focus groups, a stakeholder meeting, and expert interviews informed an updated business model and implementation framework. Conclusion: The SCED infrastructure supports person-centered, data-driven psychotherapy, empowering both patients and therapists as active scientist-practitioners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443/a000868
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bringing Single-Case Experimental Designs Into Routine Care

Julia Anna Glombiewski, Jens Heider, Philipp Herzog, Saskia Scholten et al.
Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Bringing Single-Case Experimental Designs Into Routine Care

Julia Anna Glombiewski, Jens Heider, Philipp Herzog, Saskia Scholten, Julia W. Haas, Lea Schemer, Dominik Henrich, Simon Stenkamp, Lisa Kolb-Grunder
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Theoretical Background: Single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) are well-suited for evaluating clinical interventions in routine care and enable causal inference at the individual level through repeated measurement and systematic manipulation. Objectives: This study introduces a standardized SCED infrastructure based on the software m-Path integrated into a university outpatient clinic to enhance accessibility and usability. The SCED infrastructure is used for repeated measures in everyday life in routine clinical care and can also be easily applied to conduct SCED studies in research projects. Method: The protocol for routine clinical care involves repeated 2-week assessment periods (one per day) across waiting, diagnostic, therapy, post-therapy, and follow-up phases. Emotion regulation is assessed as a transdiagnostic process alongside idiographic problem and goal items. Patients access their data via a mobile app, while therapists use automated web-based visualizations for feedback discussions. User training includes patient onboarding and therapist workshops. Results: Feedback from focus groups, a stakeholder meeting, and expert interviews informed an updated business model and implementation framework. Conclusion: The SCED infrastructure supports person-centered, data-driven psychotherapy, empowering both patients and therapists as active scientist-practitioners.

Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie
University of Applied Sciences Kaiserslautern (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.