Outcomes of One Dioptre Toric IOL Correction in Low Corneal Astigmatism: A Comparison with Non-toric IOLs

INTRODUCTION: Toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) effectively correct astigmatism, but their benefit at low levels of corneal astigmatism remains uncertain. We compared visual and refractive outcomes between non-toric and toric IOLs in patients with low corneal astigmatism. METHODS: This was a real-world comparative cohort study. We analysed 804 eyes undergoing cataract surgery for which the Barrett Toric Calculator recommended an IOL with 1 dioptre (D) of toricity. Postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), refractive astigmatism and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were compared between non-toric and toric IOL groups, with pre-specified subgroup analyses by astigmatism magnitude and axis. RESULTS: Baseline corneal astigmatism was lower in the non-toric group than in the toric group (median 0.4 versus 0.7 D; P < 0.001), reflecting surgeon selection within the Barrett-recommended 1 D toric population. Postoperative refractive astigmatism was lower in the toric group (mean 0.31 versus 0.36 D; P = 0.022), a difference smaller than the 0.25 D increment in which subjective refraction was recorded, but UDVA was comparable overall (median 79 versus 78 letters; P = 0.122) as was CDVA (median 85 versus 85 letters; P = 0.235). In the with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism subgroup, UDVA was better with non-toric IOLs (median 80 versus 77 letters; P = 0.002); against-the-rule and oblique subgroups showed no UDVA differences. CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with low corneal astigmatism, 1 D toric IOLs reduced postoperative refractive astigmatism, particularly in eyes with against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism and at higher levels of baseline corneal astigmatism, but did not improve uncorrected or corrected visual acuity overall. In eyes with WTR astigmatism, non-toric IOLs achieved better uncorrected vision. These findings suggest a statistically significant refractive benefit of low-power toric IOLs that is most evident in ATR eyes, while the functional visual benefit in this population remains uncertain and axis-dependent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-026-01483-1
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Outcomes of One Dioptre Toric IOL Correction in Low Corneal Astigmatism: A Comparison with Non-toric IOLs

Jack Kane, Ben Connell
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Outcomes of One Dioptre Toric IOL Correction in Low Corneal Astigmatism: A Comparison with Non-toric IOLs

Jack Kane, Ben Connell
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) effectively correct astigmatism, but their benefit at low levels of corneal astigmatism remains uncertain. We compared visual and refractive outcomes between non-toric and toric IOLs in patients with low corneal astigmatism. METHODS: This was a real-world comparative cohort study. We analysed 804 eyes undergoing cataract surgery for which the Barrett Toric Calculator recommended an IOL with 1 dioptre (D) of toricity. Postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), refractive astigmatism and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were compared between non-toric and toric IOL groups, with pre-specified subgroup analyses by astigmatism magnitude and axis. RESULTS: Baseline corneal astigmatism was lower in the non-toric group than in the toric group (median 0.4 versus 0.7 D; P < 0.001), reflecting surgeon selection within the Barrett-recommended 1 D toric population. Postoperative refractive astigmatism was lower in the toric group (mean 0.31 versus 0.36 D; P = 0.022), a difference smaller than the 0.25 D increment in which subjective refraction was recorded, but UDVA was comparable overall (median 79 versus 78 letters; P = 0.122) as was CDVA (median 85 versus 85 letters; P = 0.235). In the with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism subgroup, UDVA was better with non-toric IOLs (median 80 versus 77 letters; P = 0.002); against-the-rule and oblique subgroups showed no UDVA differences. CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with low corneal astigmatism, 1 D toric IOLs reduced postoperative refractive astigmatism, particularly in eyes with against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism and at higher levels of baseline corneal astigmatism, but did not improve uncorrected or corrected visual acuity overall. In eyes with WTR astigmatism, non-toric IOLs achieved better uncorrected vision. These findings suggest a statistically significant refractive benefit of low-power toric IOLs that is most evident in ATR eyes, while the functional visual benefit in this population remains uncertain and axis-dependent.

Ophthalmology and Therapy
Northern Health (AU), The Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital (AU), Vision Eye Institute (AU), Eye Care Associates (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.