When the Dead Respond: Artificial Intelligence, Continuing Bonds, and the Psychoanalytic Boundaries of Mourning

The growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in bereavement, through griefbots, post-mortem avatars, and interactive memorials, raises clinical, ethical, and anthropological questions about absence, symbolization, and the work of mourning. Drawing on psychoanalytic perspectives and contemporary grief research, this theoretical article situates AI-mediated mourning within a historical continuity of material and cultural mediations with the dead, while emphasizing a qualitative shift introduced by interactivity: traces no longer merely persist; they respond. We argue that such devices may, in certain circumstances, function as transitional supports that help contain affects and facilitate continuing bonds. However, their availability and simulated reciprocity also risk fostering avoidance of separation, relational dependency, or melancholic fixation by blurring boundaries between memory and presence. We conclude that the clinical task is not to condemn or endorse these technologies, but to assess their psychic function case by case and preserve symbolic limits alongside human presence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228261480624
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When the Dead Respond: Artificial Intelligence, Continuing Bonds, and the Psychoanalytic Boundaries of Mourning

Marie‐Frédérique Bacque, Nicolas Nieuviarts, Narcisz Ferenczi
OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
article

When the Dead Respond: Artificial Intelligence, Continuing Bonds, and the Psychoanalytic Boundaries of Mourning

Marie‐Frédérique Bacque, Nicolas Nieuviarts, Narcisz Ferenczi
article en

Abstract

The growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in bereavement, through griefbots, post-mortem avatars, and interactive memorials, raises clinical, ethical, and anthropological questions about absence, symbolization, and the work of mourning. Drawing on psychoanalytic perspectives and contemporary grief research, this theoretical article situates AI-mediated mourning within a historical continuity of material and cultural mediations with the dead, while emphasizing a qualitative shift introduced by interactivity: traces no longer merely persist; they respond. We argue that such devices may, in certain circumstances, function as transitional supports that help contain affects and facilitate continuing bonds. However, their availability and simulated reciprocity also risk fostering avoidance of separation, relational dependency, or melancholic fixation by blurring boundaries between memory and presence. We conclude that the clinical task is not to condemn or endorse these technologies, but to assess their psychic function case by case and preserve symbolic limits alongside human presence.

OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Museum of Decorative Arts in Prague (CZ), Centre d'études et de recherches internationales de Sciences Po (FR), Université de Picardie Jules Verne (FR), Université de Strasbourg (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.