News recommendation as a process: An interdisciplinary literature review

This paper investigates how different disciplines conceptualize news recommendation, addressing the challenge of fragmented knowledge in this interdisciplinary field. Through a comprehensive literature review of 476 peer-reviewed publications from 2000 to 2022, the study analyzes terminology, citation practices, and mental models in mainly computer science, communication science, and interdisciplinary research. We find distinct disciplinary terminologies and asymmetries in epistemic authority, with computer science dominating in publication volume and citations. The study identifies four mental models structuring researchers’ representations of news recommendation, ranging from system-centric technical optimization to abstract reflections on journalism. It proposes an interdisciplinary process model integrating technical and social dimensions to bridge knowledge silos and foster interdisciplinary collaboration. The paper concludes with strategies for researchers to promote interdisciplinarity, including learning other disciplinary languages and addressing power dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849261480766
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

News recommendation as a process: An interdisciplinary literature review

Laura Laugwitz
Journalism
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

News recommendation as a process: An interdisciplinary literature review

Laura Laugwitz
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates how different disciplines conceptualize news recommendation, addressing the challenge of fragmented knowledge in this interdisciplinary field. Through a comprehensive literature review of 476 peer-reviewed publications from 2000 to 2022, the study analyzes terminology, citation practices, and mental models in mainly computer science, communication science, and interdisciplinary research. We find distinct disciplinary terminologies and asymmetries in epistemic authority, with computer science dominating in publication volume and citations. The study identifies four mental models structuring researchers’ representations of news recommendation, ranging from system-centric technical optimization to abstract reflections on journalism. It proposes an interdisciplinary process model integrating technical and social dimensions to bridge knowledge silos and foster interdisciplinary collaboration. The paper concludes with strategies for researchers to promote interdisciplinarity, including learning other disciplinary languages and addressing power dynamics.

Journalism
Universität Hamburg (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.