Democratic backsliding and public administration: lessons for theory and practice

Democracy and good public administration are often thought to go hand in hand. However, the conceptual and empirical relationship has tended to be understudied and imprecisely defined. This article draws conclusions from the volume on democratic backsliding and public administration. Drawing from the real theory of democracy, high quality public administration was argued to be an essential component of democracy since it provides citizens with the critical services to empower them to live their lives. Drawing on the studies in the volume, the article concludes that there are several ways in which political leaders may undermine public administration quality. These include reducing impartiality, increasing inequalities, creating legal uncertainty, reducing knowledge, and weakening capacity. It also identifies ways in which public administration can be protected. These include constitutional provisions, legal oversight for the police and military, strengthening organizational routines, building a professional civil service culture, and providing international support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Studies
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2026.2695414
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Democratic backsliding and public administration: lessons for theory and practice

Toby S. James
Policy Studies
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Democratic backsliding and public administration: lessons for theory and practice

Toby S. James
article en

Abstract

Democracy and good public administration are often thought to go hand in hand. However, the conceptual and empirical relationship has tended to be understudied and imprecisely defined. This article draws conclusions from the volume on democratic backsliding and public administration. Drawing from the real theory of democracy, high quality public administration was argued to be an essential component of democracy since it provides citizens with the critical services to empower them to live their lives. Drawing on the studies in the volume, the article concludes that there are several ways in which political leaders may undermine public administration quality. These include reducing impartiality, increasing inequalities, creating legal uncertainty, reducing knowledge, and weakening capacity. It also identifies ways in which public administration can be protected. These include constitutional provisions, legal oversight for the police and military, strengthening organizational routines, building a professional civil service culture, and providing international support.

Policy StudiesVol. 47(5)
University of East Anglia (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Democratic backsliding and public administration: lessons for theory and practice — Toby S. James · Policy Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS