Decision Objects: The Fundamental Unit of Decision Engineering Science™

This working paper introduces the Decision Object as a fundamental unit of analysis within Decision Engineering Science (DES). It addresses a growing limitation in contemporary AI and decision-support systems: while substantial attention is given to models, predictions, agents, and outputs, the decision itself is rarely represented as a persistent, structured, and governable object. The paper proposes a formal representation of a Decision Object that captures the essential components of a bounded decision instance, including signals, context, objectives, evidence, constraints, alternatives, rationale, the resulting decision, execution, and observed outcomes. This representation creates a bridge between decision formation, governance, execution, and learning. A lifecycle model is introduced to describe how Decision Objects evolve from initiation and evidence collection through alternative evaluation, governance, decision commitment, action, outcome observation, and feedback, while maintaining a stable identity over time. The paper also introduces the Decision Object Evidence Model (DOEM) to structure the relationship between information sources, signals, evidence, alternative evaluation, rationale, and final decisions. By treating decisions rather than models as primary governance objects, the Decision Object concept provides a foundation for decision traceability, accountability, observability, auditability, and decision-quality assessment across human, AI, and hybrid decision systems. The paper positions Decision Objects as an architectural and theoretical building block for Decision Engineering Science and establishes a foundation for future research into Decision Object Graphs, decision admissibility, governance gates, decision quality metrics, and governed autonomous systems. Keywords: Decision Engineering Science, Decision Objects, Decision Governance, AI Governance, Decision Intelligence, Decision Architecture, Decision Quality, Decision Evidence, Human-AI Decision-Making, Agentic AI, Autonomous Systems

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22094076
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision Objects: The Fundamental Unit of Decision Engineering Science™

Aleksandra Pinar
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Decision Objects: The Fundamental Unit of Decision Engineering Science™

Aleksandra Pinar
article en

Abstract

This working paper introduces the Decision Object as a fundamental unit of analysis within Decision Engineering Science (DES). It addresses a growing limitation in contemporary AI and decision-support systems: while substantial attention is given to models, predictions, agents, and outputs, the decision itself is rarely represented as a persistent, structured, and governable object. The paper proposes a formal representation of a Decision Object that captures the essential components of a bounded decision instance, including signals, context, objectives, evidence, constraints, alternatives, rationale, the resulting decision, execution, and observed outcomes. This representation creates a bridge between decision formation, governance, execution, and learning. A lifecycle model is introduced to describe how Decision Objects evolve from initiation and evidence collection through alternative evaluation, governance, decision commitment, action, outcome observation, and feedback, while maintaining a stable identity over time. The paper also introduces the Decision Object Evidence Model (DOEM) to structure the relationship between information sources, signals, evidence, alternative evaluation, rationale, and final decisions. By treating decisions rather than models as primary governance objects, the Decision Object concept provides a foundation for decision traceability, accountability, observability, auditability, and decision-quality assessment across human, AI, and hybrid decision systems. The paper positions Decision Objects as an architectural and theoretical building block for Decision Engineering Science and establishes a foundation for future research into Decision Object Graphs, decision admissibility, governance gates, decision quality metrics, and governed autonomous systems. Keywords: Decision Engineering Science, Decision Objects, Decision Governance, AI Governance, Decision Intelligence, Decision Architecture, Decision Quality, Decision Evidence, Human-AI Decision-Making, Agentic AI, Autonomous Systems

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.