One Weapon, Three Manners: Case-based Discussion and Evaluation on Manner of Death

The forensic pathologist plays a critical role in determining the cause and contributing circumstances of death through medicolegal autopsy. Determination of the manner of death requires correlation of autopsy findings with scene investigation, weapon characteristics, and investigative inputs. Sharp-force injuries may result from accidental, suicidal, or homicidal circumstances, and wound morphology alone cannot establish the manner of death. This article presents three cases involving similar sharp-force mechanisms but differing manners of death and evaluates them using structured medicolegal reasoning based on scene findings, injury characteristics, and autopsy correlation. The cases demonstrate that the same broad class of weapon or injury mechanism may be associated with different manners of death. Accurate determination therefore requires a multidisciplinary, evidence-based approach integrating autopsy findings with scene investigation and other investigative information. While the forensic pathologist provides objective interpretation of injuries and cause of death, the final classification of manner of death depends on the overall medicolegal and legal assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09710973261476546
Primary Topic
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One Weapon, Three Manners: Case-based Discussion and Evaluation on Manner of Death

Kuldeep Kumar, Rahul Kaushik, Sunil Kumar Dahiya, Jitender Kumar Jakhar
Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
article

One Weapon, Three Manners: Case-based Discussion and Evaluation on Manner of Death

Kuldeep Kumar, Rahul Kaushik, Sunil Kumar Dahiya, Jitender Kumar Jakhar
article en

Abstract

The forensic pathologist plays a critical role in determining the cause and contributing circumstances of death through medicolegal autopsy. Determination of the manner of death requires correlation of autopsy findings with scene investigation, weapon characteristics, and investigative inputs. Sharp-force injuries may result from accidental, suicidal, or homicidal circumstances, and wound morphology alone cannot establish the manner of death. This article presents three cases involving similar sharp-force mechanisms but differing manners of death and evaluates them using structured medicolegal reasoning based on scene findings, injury characteristics, and autopsy correlation. The cases demonstrate that the same broad class of weapon or injury mechanism may be associated with different manners of death. Accurate determination therefore requires a multidisciplinary, evidence-based approach integrating autopsy findings with scene investigation and other investigative information. While the forensic pathologist provides objective interpretation of injuries and cause of death, the final classification of manner of death depends on the overall medicolegal and legal assessment.

Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine
Central University of Punjab (IN), Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Sarojini Naidu Medical College (IN), Asian Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.