Design, power, and transitions: A sensitizing framework

This article explores the relationship between design, power, and transitions by positioning a framework of five dimensions: agency, relationality, scale, temporality, and abduction. Thereby, it aims to open up new ways of doing and thinking design in contexts of societal transitions, complex systems, and polycrisis. Power is positioned as a multifaceted phenomenon that is implicit in many aspects of design, and that shapes the design process and outcomes by enabling and constraining the agency of design actors and participants. Each of the five dimensions provides a different conceptual angle to understand the relationship between design, power, and transitions, and is based on both empirical findings and theoretical synthesis. The article concludes by offering several pointers towards thinking and doing transition-design-as-power-work, and provides a set of reflexive questions for designers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Designing
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/30497671261475370
Primary Topic
Crafts, Textile, and Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design, power, and transitions: A sensitizing framework

Abhigyan Singh, Bregje F. van Eekelen, Gijs van Leeuwen, David Keyson
Designing
Crafts, Textile, and Design
article

Design, power, and transitions: A sensitizing framework

Abhigyan Singh, Bregje F. van Eekelen, Gijs van Leeuwen, David Keyson
article en

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between design, power, and transitions by positioning a framework of five dimensions: agency, relationality, scale, temporality, and abduction. Thereby, it aims to open up new ways of doing and thinking design in contexts of societal transitions, complex systems, and polycrisis. Power is positioned as a multifaceted phenomenon that is implicit in many aspects of design, and that shapes the design process and outcomes by enabling and constraining the agency of design actors and participants. Each of the five dimensions provides a different conceptual angle to understand the relationship between design, power, and transitions, and is based on both empirical findings and theoretical synthesis. The article concludes by offering several pointers towards thinking and doing transition-design-as-power-work, and provides a set of reflexive questions for designers.

Designing
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Rijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Crafts, Textile, and Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Design, power, and transitions: A sensitizing framework — Abhigyan Singh, Bregje F. van Eekelen, et al. · Designing (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS