Figures of dissent: Women, mathematics, and the politics of refusal

This paper examines the entangled relationships between mathematics, politics, and gender through the lives of two nineteenth-century women mathematicians, Mary Somerville and Sofia Kovalevskaya, using Bonnie Honig's (2021) ‘arc of refusal’ as a plane of analysis. By exploring their political and intellectual trajectories, I argue that their acts of refusal—whether in resisting prescribed gender roles, challenging institutional norms, or defying exclusionary scientific practices—illustrate how refusal operates as a dynamic, relational, and open-ended political and epistemic practice. I suggest that their refusals were not merely acts of personal defiance but gestures that re-imagined the boundaries of science and politics, creating new spaces for engagement and participation. Through this lens, Somerville and Kovalevskaya's lives reveal the intricate ways in which mathematical inquiry, political activism, and gender intersect, and how their refusals continue to reverberate in contemporary struggles over knowledge, power, and representation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Women s Studies International Forum
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2026.103417
Primary Topic
History and Theory of Mathematics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Figures of dissent: Women, mathematics, and the politics of refusal

Maria Tamboukou
Women s Studies International Forum
History and Theory of Mathematics
article

Figures of dissent: Women, mathematics, and the politics of refusal

Maria Tamboukou
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the entangled relationships between mathematics, politics, and gender through the lives of two nineteenth-century women mathematicians, Mary Somerville and Sofia Kovalevskaya, using Bonnie Honig's (2021) ‘arc of refusal’ as a plane of analysis. By exploring their political and intellectual trajectories, I argue that their acts of refusal—whether in resisting prescribed gender roles, challenging institutional norms, or defying exclusionary scientific practices—illustrate how refusal operates as a dynamic, relational, and open-ended political and epistemic practice. I suggest that their refusals were not merely acts of personal defiance but gestures that re-imagined the boundaries of science and politics, creating new spaces for engagement and participation. Through this lens, Somerville and Kovalevskaya's lives reveal the intricate ways in which mathematical inquiry, political activism, and gender intersect, and how their refusals continue to reverberate in contemporary struggles over knowledge, power, and representation.

Women s Studies International ForumVol. 119
University of East London (GB)
Leverhulme Trust
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
History and Theory of Mathematics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.