Evidence-informed person-centred practice: an integrative framework for evidence use in healthcare

Integrating evidence into clinical care has become a defining feature of modern healthcare. Longstanding evidence-based approaches, including evidence-based medicine, evidence-based practice, and evidence-informed practice have strengthened expectations that healthcare professionals will locate, interpret, and apply research evidence in everyday decision-making. Yet persistent tensions remain. Limited and inconsistent patient involvement, challenges in sustaining the skills needed to enact evidence use, the hierarchical privileging of empirical research over other meaningful forms of knowledge, and the influence of contextual and systemic constraints continue to impede its practical uptake. Together, these conceptual and operational limitations highlight the value of an integrative framework that more fully reflects the complexities and realities of contemporary care. Guided by principles of a critical review, we examined foundational and contemporary literature on evidence-based approaches and related concepts (e.g. context, reflective practice, implementation). We reviewed influential texts and supplemented them with targeted searches to identify constructs underrepresented in the initial sources. The framework was then developed and refined through the combined expertise and positionality of the research team and a co-production process with leaders from a national professional association. We propose the Evidence-Informed Person-Centred Practice (EIPP) framework, which integrates and extends existing approaches to evidence use by making explicit the dynamic, collaborative, and context-responsive nature of evidence use. EIPP comprises four enactment processes: research awareness, shared decision-making, reflective practice, and implementation, each supported by distinct forms of critical thinking. These processes are shaped by three outer domains: systemic contextual conditions, professional accountability, and collective readiness. Together, these components support the delivery of individualized, appropriate care: the right care, by the right provider, for the right patient, in the right setting, and at the right time. Beyond proximal outcomes, EIPP aims to contribute to broader goals of health and well-being, health equity, provider experience, and system efficiency, aligning with the Quintuple Aim. EIPP offers an integrative synthesis of existing approaches to evidence use by making explicit the interdependence of knowledge, context, partnerships, and action. The framework brings together multiple knowledge sources, collaborative decision-making, reflective practice, and implementation, while positioning the use of evidence as a shared responsibility shaped by professional and systemic conditions. Future research should examine the feasibility, usability, and impact of EIPP across diverse care settings and determine how it may need to be adapted across professional, organizational, cultural, and health system contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Research Policy and Systems
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-026-01528-8
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence-informed person-centred practice: an integrative framework for evidence use in healthcare

Aliki Thomas, Dawn P. Richards, Marco Zaccagnini, Andrew West et al.
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Evidence-informed person-centred practice: an integrative framework for evidence use in healthcare

Aliki Thomas, Dawn P. Richards, Marco Zaccagnini, Andrew West, Ian D. Graham
article en

Abstract

Integrating evidence into clinical care has become a defining feature of modern healthcare. Longstanding evidence-based approaches, including evidence-based medicine, evidence-based practice, and evidence-informed practice have strengthened expectations that healthcare professionals will locate, interpret, and apply research evidence in everyday decision-making. Yet persistent tensions remain. Limited and inconsistent patient involvement, challenges in sustaining the skills needed to enact evidence use, the hierarchical privileging of empirical research over other meaningful forms of knowledge, and the influence of contextual and systemic constraints continue to impede its practical uptake. Together, these conceptual and operational limitations highlight the value of an integrative framework that more fully reflects the complexities and realities of contemporary care. Guided by principles of a critical review, we examined foundational and contemporary literature on evidence-based approaches and related concepts (e.g. context, reflective practice, implementation). We reviewed influential texts and supplemented them with targeted searches to identify constructs underrepresented in the initial sources. The framework was then developed and refined through the combined expertise and positionality of the research team and a co-production process with leaders from a national professional association. We propose the Evidence-Informed Person-Centred Practice (EIPP) framework, which integrates and extends existing approaches to evidence use by making explicit the dynamic, collaborative, and context-responsive nature of evidence use. EIPP comprises four enactment processes: research awareness, shared decision-making, reflective practice, and implementation, each supported by distinct forms of critical thinking. These processes are shaped by three outer domains: systemic contextual conditions, professional accountability, and collective readiness. Together, these components support the delivery of individualized, appropriate care: the right care, by the right provider, for the right patient, in the right setting, and at the right time. Beyond proximal outcomes, EIPP aims to contribute to broader goals of health and well-being, health equity, provider experience, and system efficiency, aligning with the Quintuple Aim. EIPP offers an integrative synthesis of existing approaches to evidence use by making explicit the interdependence of knowledge, context, partnerships, and action. The framework brings together multiple knowledge sources, collaborative decision-making, reflective practice, and implementation, while positioning the use of evidence as a shared responsibility shaped by professional and systemic conditions. Future research should examine the feasibility, usability, and impact of EIPP across diverse care settings and determine how it may need to be adapted across professional, organizational, cultural, and health system contexts.

Health Research Policy and Systems
University of Ottawa (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Glycemic Index Laboratories (CA), Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (CA), Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation (CA), Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CA), Ottawa Public Health (CA), McGill University (CA)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.