From a benevolent instrument of soft power to an object of securitization: The case of Chinese Confucius Institutes in Germany (2006–2025)

This paper argues and demonstrates that the effect of instruments designed to project soft power is conditional and reversible when they are revised and reinterpreted through political and security lenses as threats. Drawing on insights from securitization theory, I show that Chinese Confucius Institutes (CIs) become securitized when framed as a threat to academic freedom. Using Germany as a least-likely case, I demonstrate how CIs shifted from being a source of soft power—spreading the Chinese language and culture—to an object of securitization that threatens academic freedom, a core component of the democratic model of governance enshrined in Germany’s constitution. The findings indicate that the CIs’ rapid expansion and institutional integration into German universities (2006-2017) were followed by increasing politicization. The issue has since been widely framed as a security concern, as reflected in reports by Germany’s intelligence agencies and in its first China strategy paper, published in 2023.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Strategy
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2026.2714808
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From a benevolent instrument of soft power to an object of securitization: The case of Chinese Confucius Institutes in Germany (2006–2025)

Ramin Asadi
Comparative Strategy
Global Security and Public Health
article

From a benevolent instrument of soft power to an object of securitization: The case of Chinese Confucius Institutes in Germany (2006–2025)

Ramin Asadi
article en

Abstract

This paper argues and demonstrates that the effect of instruments designed to project soft power is conditional and reversible when they are revised and reinterpreted through political and security lenses as threats. Drawing on insights from securitization theory, I show that Chinese Confucius Institutes (CIs) become securitized when framed as a threat to academic freedom. Using Germany as a least-likely case, I demonstrate how CIs shifted from being a source of soft power—spreading the Chinese language and culture—to an object of securitization that threatens academic freedom, a core component of the democratic model of governance enshrined in Germany’s constitution. The findings indicate that the CIs’ rapid expansion and institutional integration into German universities (2006-2017) were followed by increasing politicization. The issue has since been widely framed as a security concern, as reflected in reports by Germany’s intelligence agencies and in its first China strategy paper, published in 2023.

Comparative Strategy
University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global Security and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From a benevolent instrument of soft power to an object of securitization: The case of Chinese Confucius Institutes in Germany (2006–2025) — Ramin Asadi · Comparative Strategy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS